Quote:
Originally Posted by J_tacular
V2: TAG player, late 20s. hero has not seen V2 get out of line, and he is a winning player. ($450)
V2 in CO raises to $15
Hero OTB looks down at AT
I was considering 3 betting here, since I knew his LP raising was wide, but we were deep so I just flatted (thoughts?).
If V is
really a TAG player - then he's NOT raising in LP wide. He's doing it with strong hands that would probably be 55+, AK, AQs. That is what a TAG player does.
V1 is
super nitty - and she bets 1/3 of her stack on the flop. What's her range? She limped then called a pfr oop. Here, she could show up with a set, A4 and medium over pairs, right?
V2 who "hero has not seen V2 get out of line" now repops it to 80.
What's he doing THAT with? He raised pre-flop - and then re-raised on the flop. Here, he could have a set, an over pair or the second nut flush (K
Q
, Q
J
, K
J
). If he's got a FD, we WANT him to keep betting.
I don't understand the urgency to shove here when we're only getting called by better hands. If V2 has a flush draw - we DON'T want to push him out of the pot. By raising, you're only getting called by better hands and folding out the ones we beat.
In most cases, Super Nitty is probably shoving to the $80 re-pop so we'll be in for $100. 3-betting here is only guaranteeing that we go heads up with a nutted hand as a 2:1 dog.
I might be in the minority here, but I think against a Super Nit and a TAG player, overplaying a FD is a very high variance play. I'm in the call camp. See the turn and re-evaluate.