1/2 NL. Four hours into session. 9 Handed. Table leans tight, but definitely a fair amount of loose play and bluffs.
Hero ($400, BTN): Hero has a very aggressive image to villain. Villain probably sees hero as slightly more tight than loose, but still doesn't give hero a whole lot of credit. Hero has been playing pretty well; his stack has been fluctuating a little bit (as low as $100 early, as high as $500).
Villain ($300, MP1): Villain is a very arrogant, but losing player. Hero and villain play together at least once a week. Villain has a good amount of money because of his profession, but over the year hero and villain have played together, hero would say villain loses twice for every one time he wins. Villain is the guy that always has something to say about everything, views himself as a very advanced player, thinks he's a king at reading, only shows his bluffs or his "hero lay downs," regularly talks strategy at the table and whenever someone makes the wrong fold or call, he always makes a point to say, "how did you do that?! I am folding/calling there every single time!" Villain's play fluctuates between loose and tight, but he's usually playing looser at a loose table and tighter at a tight table; overall he's a little more loose than tight and plays too many hands.
OTTH
Folds around to villain who limps, CO limps, and hero looks up to K
10
who raises to $14. Only villain calls.
Flop ($33) A
7
3
Villain checks and hero c-bets $17, which hero calls.
Turn ($67) K
Villain checks and hero checks back (bad check?)
River ($67) 9
Villain leads out for $75. Hero?