Saturday night table. Lotsa laughing and chatting. Lots of hands going to showdown. Pretty juicy, but not outa control PF. Raises are small by local standards (mostly $8-12, no bigger than $15) and pretty much no three betting so far. Game has been going for about an hour.
The cast:
V1: ($137) A psychotherapist in town for a training course. Middle-aged black man with a lot of gamble in him. Came over to the table saying he just won a grand at Blackjack, and proceeded to spew his 1st $300 buy-in to V2.
V2: (covers, about $260) Thinking player, seems laggy. Opening more often than anyone else at the table and c-bets a very high percentage of flops (often into 3 opponents). C-bets are usually about PSB or overbets. Usually shuts down if called on flop (have seen him c-bet, then c/f turn several times) but has so far had the goods (TPTK+) on the two or three times he's continued to build the pot with bets or calls on turn and river. Also a middle-aged middle-class black man, but more "blingy" than V1.
Hero: ($235) Playing very ABC so far. Lost half a stack to V2 when he bet three streets but gave me odds and I folded river when my draw missed.
Significant recent action: About an orbit ago V1 limps, V2 raises, V1 calls (as do one or two others).
V1 checks flop, V2 c-bets a bit over half pot ($15, smaller than usual). V1 check/min-raises, V2 calls. (pot ~$85)
V1 leads turn for $70, V2 thinks for a long time and finally calls.
V1 shoves last $67 OTR and V2 goes deep in the tank, before finally calling with AK for top two-pair. V1 has total air and rebuys for $200.
The hand: V1 limps in EP, one more limper. V2 raise to $12 OTB
Hero has AcJc in SB and calls (thoughts? I think I'm way ahead of LAG's range here, but don't want to make the games first 3-bet OOP with this hand. I could fold here, but figure that LAG will almost always c-bet and if we;'re HU I plan to float)
BB folds, V1 calls, other limper folds. Three to the flop. ($36 after rake)
Flop: AQ8r (one club)
Hero checks with intent of c/c for pot control barring crazy action
V1 checks
V2 c-bets $30
Hero calls (thoughts on this line?)
V1 min-raises. This is starting to look really familiar...
V2 calls (pot $150)
Hero calls getting silly odds with TPGK, even though the pot is now bigger than I want to play with this hand. Any virtue to shoving here since pot-control is out the window anyway?
Turn: AQ8Kdd (pot $180)
V1 shoves his last $65
V2 calls, leaving us about $130 deep against each other, and starts talking to V1, asking if he has a set, saying he has outs if he does. "I'm looking for a boat." Obv V2 knows I still have to act, but not obv if he's talking to influence me or if he just thinks I'm folding for sure based on my passive line so far.
I really hate calling villain 1's min check-raise. Seems pretty clear that we'll be forced to commit on the turn and I don't want to get stacks in vs villain 2 with this hand.
But once we call the flop, I'm going with it on the turn because we must have decided that V2 could have Ace-rag and there is no reason for us to suddenly change that read now that there is even more money in the pot.
I was worried about commitment, but I don't see how we can fold to the LAG's bet, which really doesn't narrow his range at all, and once it gets back to us we're getting 5-1 to call the min-raise with TPTK. I don't know if we're just playing for trips and 2-pair if we continue, but those odds seem too juicy to pass up, esp against a LAG and a player who has shown the ability to min-raise with air.
Preflop is fine given read. You're ahead of lags range, and you'll let the fish in the pot and other limpers. AJs plays well enough multiway.
Flop, I c/c and then fold to the raise. I'm not sure what you are getting silly odds for? You can be drawing dead and you often only improve to second best.
I think I would prefer a 3bet preflop to try to get heads up with V2.
As played what are the thoughts of check raising the flop with the intention of stacking off? V1 might gamble with you and your hand should still be ahead of V2's range. And if you are ahead of V2 he's likely to shut down unimproved on the turn and river.
^^^ I lieky. I never even thought of that line. I never seriously considered this, as I wanted to realize my SDV and it seems like turning TPGK into a bluff, but it has major advantages in that the fish may well give me value with worse, and the LAG is unlikely to call, and likely to slow down if so, unless he has me crushed.
I don't know if the psychotherapist thought that we thought that he'd never take the same line on a similar board twice in a row as a stone-cold bluff, or if he was just a spew-monkey, but...
It's dangerous to get sandwiched between two players who are going to war. Then again, it's a great spot to be in when you have real value.
But in a spot like this AJ becomes marginal very quickly and the problem is you have no idea where you're at. I think you have to either make an aggressive commitment decision early in the hand, or GTFO.
On to the hand. Pre I would consider 3betting (which would look strong at a table with no 3bets) ie JJ+. Calling is fine as it gets the fish involved, plus u crush btn's range. Otf I think I would lead for 25 and fold to a btn raise (btn by description won't raise without it, and I would rather lead an amount I wanted, than to CC a PSB) probably play a big pot if the fish raised (once btn cold calls the fish raise) I am done with the hand
But in a spot like this AJ becomes marginal very quickly and the problem is you have no idea where you're at. I think you have to either make an aggressive commitment decision early in the hand, or GTFO.