Hey, I still haven't gotten back into the 2/5 grind, as I'm trying to make a couple of grand at 1/2 first to instil my confidence back. 1/2, 9 handed, $300 effective. Villain is a losing LAG with a big ego, but also isn't clueless; villain is a super station to c bets, and will call with complete air regularly just to try and bluff a later street. Hero has a winning TAG image to villain.
OTTH
Hero opens LJ $15 A
J
and only villain calls in BB.
Flop ($31): 8
3
2
. Villain checks and hero checks back. This is a flop that I'm range betting vs 95%ish of villains. From Flopzilla analysis though, we can realistically expect villain to continue ~80% of the time (calling all of his A high, K high, and draws including gutshots.)
Turn ($31): 7
. Villain bets $20 and hero calls. Villain doesn't have sizing tells (at least afaIk), and is going to be super aggressive vs a flop x back. Am I right in thinking that unblocking all of the straight and flush draws that folding AJ here vs this villain type is too weak?
River ($71): K
. Villain bets $75 and hero calls. This card should connect a lot better with hero than it did with villain. Villain's story is not adding up at all. Literally every draw bricked. I don't expect villain to ever have any 2p with a K in it, because while he plays stupid hands like K8s and K7s vs raises, he's well aware that hero is tight and I know he's not dumb enough to go HU OOP vs hero with those kinds of hands. I honestly don't expect villain to expect me to call the turn with AK either, so if he had a hand like 87, I would expect him to choose a more value-y size like $40 otr. Is my reasoning sound or am I just talking myself into thinking I made a good call down? Oh, and I'm completely aware that this is NOT how we make the plurality of our money, but I also don't want to get pushed around by this villain.