Monday night at Mandalay Bay. At this point table is five regs and 3 empty seats, i.e. 6 max.
Villain is in seat 1, hero is in seat 7. Villain is Brazilian and has been playing pretty aggro both preflop and postflop. His VPIP/PFR is something like 45/26. We have had a bit of dynamics going on. On our first hand I check/raised the flop with an OESD against his PFR and c-bet and took it down on the turn after firing a 1/2 psb. On another hand I raised in MP with JJ, he called OTB with TT and raised my c-bet when the flop came 9 high with two clubs. I called, it went check/check on turn Ks and check/check on river Ad and he seemed mildly annoyed as I raked in the pot. In another hand I made a PFR and fired two barrels after a Q high flop and he folded with a frown on his face.
I have been opening a lot with $7 PFRs to keep a somewhat higher SPR postflop. I was hoping that I would get 3bet with my big pairs after doing this for a while with the rest of my range.
In this hand hero starts with ~$320 and villain covers.
Folds to hero in HJ who finds A
A
. Hero raises to $7. CO folds, villain on BTN calls, blinds fold. Flop comes J
8
4
. Hero bets $11, BTN calls with a look of slight anger in his eyes. Turn A
. Hero bets $20, BTN raises to $40. Hero ???
On one hand, I liked a 3bet to shovel money into the middle and set up a larger river leadout. But seeing a 3bet allows a "frustrated" villain to shut down on both his "take a stand with one pair" hands as well as his gut shot bluffs. Is the 3bet valid in a HU spot like this, or is there merit to flatting? If we do 3bet, what is the magic number we should be aiming for? If we do flat, do we hope to check/raise the river or do we lead out?