Against this villain in particular. I should slightly elaborate on my tightness while I'm playing tight in terms of opening ranges. I've still have been c-betting a lot on most flops and a relatively stickish villain, I have to bet even third pair for value, because I'm going to get called by High cards draws, or maybe some pocket pairs.While Villain is sticky on the flop due to my high-cbet percentage, he's going to be less sticky on turns and rivers due to my lower 2nd barrel/3rd barrel.

As played, I chked it back, and we chopped against JT. So Results oriented, I should have jammed it in his face. I don't think that there are that many bricked draws. I think he's probably more likely to raise them, I'm not sure myself really. I'm not so confident that we can completely eliminate aces. He could have some weak aces that he's not going to raise, say, A2-A5s. I don't think he's raising those aces? I don't think he's folding weak aces here, he's probably folding most to all queens, and all Tens. He's probably has all of the suited aces, we can elimenate most of AT+, as he'll 3-bet with them. Still, they're probably more combos of QT,KQ,QJ,Q9, and some JT,T9,KT's we can fold out. I don't think he has that many weak aces off-suit, as they run into more domination issues, and he's a competent player. But I'm not sure, if he shows up with A3o, then jamming here is terrible.