Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
1/2 AA OOP Too Multi-way Bloated Pot 1/2 AA OOP Too Multi-way Bloated Pot

03-25-2016 , 03:28 PM
1/2. Hero MAWG plays a tag style mostly. I'm tighter than the rest of the table, but have been caught raising light in position several times, also shown down the goods and won a lot of pots w/o showdown.

Hero has red AA in the BB $400ish.

V1 UTG. Short stack $65 no reads.

V2 MP: Tighter than most at the table. Pretty ABC. About $200

V3 CO: Looser and more aggressive than most of the table. Sticky with draws, any piece. Pretty good hand reader tho, so not a spew monkey. Covers Hero.


4 limps + SB to Hero in the BB who makes it $18. I figure this will get it 3 way or heads up with V3 most likely never folding here.... but all V's call. So here we go.

Flop: $75ish 578ss. Hero checks. Even though check through would be bad, I don't believe this will get past V3 if it checks to him.
V1 shoves $47 or whatever. V2 tank calls. V3 mini-tank calls. The pot is now $220, hero facing $47 and has $380 behind.
1/2 AA OOP Too Multi-way Bloated Pot Quote
03-25-2016 , 03:39 PM
Jam

Main vil has to raise 2pair+ here 100% of he has a quarter of a brain,protect your hand, absorb the variance from the nit.

With this logic, what is your plan facing a bet from vil 3 otf?
1/2 AA OOP Too Multi-way Bloated Pot Quote
03-25-2016 , 03:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sungar78
Jam

Main vil has to raise 2pair+ here 100% of he has a quarter of a brain,protect your hand, absorb the variance from the nit.

With this logic, what is your plan facing a bet from vil 3 otf?
Forgot to include this, based on the action, each successive V was less likely to be ahead. V1 was a mystery, but he's almost unimportant. V2 my thought was almost certainly going to raise if he had 2p+. I considered it a mortal lock that V3 did not have 2p+.

As that action unfolded all I can honestly say is I was hoping V3 did not 3! otf. I would have had to tank and really think about it.
1/2 AA OOP Too Multi-way Bloated Pot Quote
03-25-2016 , 05:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by donkatruck
Forgot to include this, based on the action, each successive V was less likely to be ahead. V1 was a mystery, but he's almost unimportant. V2 my thought was almost certainly going to raise if he had 2p+. I considered it a mortal lock that V3 did not have 2p+.
Is this read based on previous observed behavior or based on projecting onto them what you would do in their place?
1/2 AA OOP Too Multi-way Bloated Pot Quote
03-25-2016 , 05:29 PM
Shove for sure. There's OE and FD out there and the players who tank called are so much more likely to be on draws than have 2P+. Anyone with 78 for example would have raised.

Theres $220 in the middle. You would love to take it down right here or if not, charge the draws the max to try to get there.
1/2 AA OOP Too Multi-way Bloated Pot Quote
03-25-2016 , 06:11 PM
I'm not going to do the math for you, but if someone is really interested in putting in the work doing analysis away from the table, I suggest comparing the value of shoving the flop here vs calling and shoving a safe turn.
1/2 AA OOP Too Multi-way Bloated Pot Quote
03-26-2016 , 07:41 AM
Jam-a-Rama. Bunch of tank calls are hoping to hit their draws. Disappoint them.

Do you have the As?
1/2 AA OOP Too Multi-way Bloated Pot Quote
03-26-2016 , 11:40 AM
I had red AA.

I think everybody here is correct.
Results:

Spoiler:
I raised to $175 trying to fold V2 and keep V3 in who's range is wider and included IMO 1-pair type hands. V2 tank folded. V3 folded. V1 showed 89o and I faded his 9 outs.
No idea what V3 had, but V2 said he had T9o. My raise essentially was all-in for V2, but if V3 had a real draw a shove would have been better because he's likely calling either. Thanks for the replies.
1/2 AA OOP Too Multi-way Bloated Pot Quote

      
m