1/2, with the $5 rock in CO and $10 re straddle OTB. $1.3k effective with main villain. Hero has a TAG image.

I only have an hour and a half collectively with villain, but he seems very fishy, despite telling the table very seriously that he's the best player and only pro. I don't wanna spoil the other HH, but the other two hands I played vs him were:

1) 1/2/5, $500 effective, rock UTG, he opens $20 +2, I 3bet AQo $70 LJ, he calls. Flop 965r. X-x. Turn Kx. He bets $40-I call. River K. X-x, and he has 65s.

2) 1/2/20, $500 effective, rock (+$15) OTB, he calls SB, I $100 +1 AK and only he calls. Flop AcJc4h. X-I $70-he shoves and I call. He has 8h7h.


OTTH

Fish limps UTG, I raise to $50 with A Q and only villain calls in double straddle OTB.

Flop ($118): A T 7. We bet $60, villain calls.

Turn ($238): 5. We bet $100 and villain calls.

River ($438): 3. Hero? I can't imagine checking here. What sizing do you like versus this villain?

$125 seems fine

around 200

$185/Call if he moves in.

What bluffs could this guy possibly have if he shoves?

I actually like a check/evaluate on the river. Not sure why we feel compelled to bet.

Because we can get value from all worse Ax that he'll x back if we x...X-c here is bad