I'd prefer to have absolute position on the pair of them (and everyone else).
I'd be very happy if the blinds fold, but wonder if my putting in the 4th bet matters a lot vs the actual blinds in the hand. If it doesn't, I'm curious as to whether or not "decent player and/or TAG and/or nit opens" would do me the favor of defining her hand by capping some of her range.
If I considered calling, I'd do it with hands that don't mind all 4 bets going in preflop.
You and I might disagree with ranges. What do you consider
Quote:
She should have a pretty tight range.
Is this AQ+, JJ+? Is this 99+, ATs+, AJo+, KJs+?
I'd at least consider how showdown bound the original raiser is. If she makes a lot of post flop folding mistakes, then I'm more interested in giving action. Like on a T
T
3
board, you see her b/f the flop when both you and the manic raise, that's fun/exciting.
Once you have ranges.
Quote:
Poker Stove is your friend.
I assume one of the pluses here is that you can trust UTG or UTG+1's action. If she knows that she can use the manic to make you miserable and is correctly tricky in doing so, it is
time.