A true maniac (someone who bets/raises 100% of the time) is better on your left, as his predictable play gives you position on the table.
Quote:
He is three betting and capping most of time and calling the rest pre flop.
Is most of the time 51%, 75%, or 95%? The closer the answer is to 100%, the more I'm just as happy to act before this person. This gives you the option to control the odds of the people behind the collective that you and the maniac create. If he's just really aggressive or willing to adjust, you're not as happy. The game should be great, unless he's not a maniac and actually a good LAG or a close to good LAG. Then you were in a bad passive game and it is now a bad aggressive one.
Quote:
You can no longer iso raise.
You get to iso 3 bet, and play a huge pot with two bad players?
Quote:
Do you consider just calling it a day and leaving? In this particular case I had played 4 hours of about 6 I was planning. I foresee a lot of variance in this situation.
Is the idea to quit to lock up a win? It sounds like the game wasn't that great to begin with. Now it got significantly better, though volatile.
A reason to leave is that you're under-rolled. That might make sadface leaving OK.