Quote:
Originally Posted by Abbaddabba
and another thing to consider...
people who are only sitting in full 10/20 and 15/30s and are being selective cant really be in the running for "highest winrate", and it would be really tough for them to be competitive for highest hourly rates.
effective winrates include benefits, and games that are raked higher will tend to understate that. break even at 3/6 and 5/10 can mean as much as 4BB/100 in actual earnings.
and if you're playing indiscriminately, your $/hand will be lower, but hourly will be much higher.
i agree abba. I'm a perfect example of that. I sit in about 95% of 5-10 games. I mean, if it's me, and 5 players like you, i'll leave, but just put 1 40-15 in there, and i'll play 5-10
10-20+ i'm more picky.
but, to get back on point, i'm a perfect example of this, the four months of me on that website, i'm running at basically even over 110K hands, but I generate so much rakeback and bonuses, I'm up a lot. ILP is up 17K in poker, but I have made a lot more by the fact I play 5x as many hands as he does.
To be completely honest, I know you guys are all good players, and you are making lots of money, just like I am, playing a stupid game.
When NW asked me if I though he was top 5, I couldn't say, because really, who can know. I just know who I think is really good, who I think is good, but with some leaks, and who I think are average regs, then the fish.
biker, sorry if I got you upset, I just wanted to get some excitement in the offically censored AP regs thread.