Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 10,998
In hand 1, we have 2nd pair/weak kicker on a rainbow board and our ten is blocking some villain's gut shot straight draws. I see nothing wrong with checking back and inducing our opponent to barrel off his bluffs while saving 2 small bets when we're beat and get c/r'd
Hand 2 is similar imo. Yes we have a vulnerable hand and can easily stand getting c/r'd, this flop should still hit more of bb's range than ours. Plus, we can pick off bluffs and are more likely to get in a raise when we catch perfect. We may also get a lot of free show downs on runouts that might prevent bb from barreling
Hand 3 I don't see a huge problem letting a free turn card fall and inducing bets from worse hands on turn and river. Betting gets at least called by better hands while forcing out many more hands we don't want to fold
But it's always player dependent. If villain is the type to always chase gut shots and call down ace-high. then betting flop easily could be the most profitable line to take in each of these hands
Lastly, (as I think unguarded mentioned in another post), by including "some" stronger check backs in our range on flops and turns, allows us to arrive at a more optimal bluff to value bet ratio even on blank turns and rivers