Quote:
Originally Posted by DTLB
How bad would folding be here? I ask because this situation seems pretty hopeless. Vs a set we're dead. Vs 2P we have 3 outs and nowhere near the odds to call, nor the ability to make up the odds OTR. The flop was as dry as you can get so no draws are possible. AQ is almost impossible because 8/16 players don't overplay AQ in these kind of spots. They're far more likely to call to showdown.
We 3b pre oop and bet twice post and yet the original pfr still sees fit to raise the turn with a third player in between. We beat nothing, chop at best and will likely face another bet OTR. Given all this is calling still better than folding? If so what are the reasons?
Pretty bad.
For starters, you have more than 3 outs vs several two pair combinations. Versus J9, J4, 94 you have 8 outs.
If you take issue with those hands being in villain's range, here is how you are doing against a pretty strong range that doesn't even include those weaker two pair hands:
ProPokerTools Hold'em Simulation
1,232 trials (Exhaustive)
board: A
9
4
J
AsKh
8.77% (108 wins, 0 ties)
AA, JJ, 99, 44, AJ, A9, A4
91.23% (1,124 wins, 0 ties)
If he turned over that range face up, I think it is still a call as you are getting 10.5 to 1.
This is probably a little more accurate assessment of villain's range:
ProPokerTools Hold'em Simulation
1,584 trials (Exhaustive)
board: A
9
4
J
AsKh
11.36% (180 wins, 0 ties)
JJ, 99, 44, AJ, A9, A4, J9
88.64% (1,404 wins, 0 ties)
If you want to spend time arguing about what is vs what isn't in someone's range, then have at it. But every once in a while I wouldn't be surprised to see random hands including: AQ, AT, KK, QQ, QTs, T8s, etc. trying for a "free card."
People lose their minds sometimes, and I think that pushes us over the edge to a call. Plus, river's check through a surprising amount of times.
Last edited by Aku; 10-28-2017 at 01:33 PM.
Reason: Sorry forgot pocket 9's. And no backdoor flush draw.