Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
2018 NC/LC - Misteaks Were Made 2018 NC/LC - Misteaks Were Made

02-22-2018 , 11:15 PM
To clarify further, the players in position can complete the bet because they haven't acted yet - she can't. It would have to be at least half a bet for her to raise.
02-22-2018 , 11:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by daveopie
I'm not sure of a ruling at our table today.

SB checks the turn, EP goes all in for 3/8 of a bet. 2 LP's call the partial bet and SB wants to raise. Obviously, she can't raise since the betting wasn't reopened, but dealer gave her the choice of calling or completing. Can SB complete here? I didn't think so but both dealer and floor said she could.
FWIW at Winstar you're not allowed to participate in a hand unless you have a full big blind in front of you at the start of it.
02-22-2018 , 11:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDarkKnight
I've been playing OFC on my phone
PEA

(please expand acronym)
02-22-2018 , 11:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DalTXColtsFan
FWIW at Winstar you're not allowed to participate in a hand unless you have a full big blind in front of you at the start of it.
That is generally the rule everywhere, but this happened on the turn.

OFC is open face Chinese poker
02-22-2018 , 11:55 PM
One more quick thing for TDK and I'll stop hogging the thread:

I enjoy reading your blogs, please keep them coming. "Not planning to post $4/$8 hands but I feel like this one is worth sharing. I open AQ and get cold-called in four spots. Flop is AKJ, I bet and everyone folds." <===I almost laughed out loud!

I don't know how you can type so well on your phone. I frickin' hate typing on a phone, I don't even like BROWSING on it. I wait until I get back to my laptop to type on a proper keyboard.
02-23-2018 , 01:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DalTXColtsFan
PEA

(please expand acronym)
Open Faces Chinese poker
02-23-2018 , 01:14 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DalTXColtsFan

I don't know how you can type so well on your phone. I frickin' hate typing on a phone, I don't even like BROWSING on it. I wait until I get back to my laptop to type on a proper keyboard.
Well it's certainly not because I'm good at multitasking.

I guess I've gotten used to it. I revise when I get home or the next day and I always spot a decent amount of typos. Also, the Wordpress app gets laggier the longer I have it open. So updating at 2 AM tends to be really buggy and annoying.
02-23-2018 , 01:15 AM
My phone story:

The guy to my right was playing Angry Birds and I noted a huge tell. If he was dealt a good hand (one he intended to play no matter what), he would put down his phone, even if he was in the middle of a round. If he was dealt a mediocre hand (one he might play for 1 bet but fold for 2), he would finish that round but not start another round. If he was dealt a ****ty hand he would just keep playing.

So he looks at his cards and starts a new round, and basically telegraphs a fold. But it's folded to him in the CO and he looks up, sees nobody in the pot, looks left, sees he's the CO, and then raises. I snap 3-bet.

Fortunately, my read was spot on - at showdown, I fastroll, and then he rolls 84o.

Unfortunately, he showed his 84o because the hand I 3-bet him with was dominated by 84o.

I've never seen someone so pissed off after WINNING a pot. He couldn't even stack the pot, as soon as the dealer pushed thr pot in his direction, he slammed his hand on the table and then stormed off.
02-23-2018 , 01:30 AM
Wait... why was he mad?
02-23-2018 , 03:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDarkKnight
Wait... why was he mad?
Teddy kgb threw his cookies when the same thing happened to him.
02-23-2018 , 09:57 AM
I remember when 6max regs saw a guy playing 35/25 and everyone wanted in the pot to get a piece of the maniac.

Now? you're a nit if you don't open 76s in the HJ.
02-23-2018 , 10:05 AM
24/17 for life IMO
02-23-2018 , 11:39 AM
The DERB is king.
02-23-2018 , 12:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDarkKnight

Also, some of you really aren't grasping how the stat tracker works. It's super easy to use and pretty discreet. I keep the brightness on my phone as low as possible so the people next to me can't see what I'm doing. Something I'm definitely NOT doing is messing around with it while I'm in the middle of hands.
Lemme grasp dat real quick.

Nah that's cool, if no one knows what you're doing and you're not blabbing about it then do your thing.

Sincerely,

A terrible player
02-23-2018 , 12:58 PM
The blabbing part is where I went wrong
02-23-2018 , 01:01 PM
I mean you're halfway there.
02-23-2018 , 04:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDarkKnight
The blabbing part is where I went wrong
Probably.

Many people are buried in their devices, may slow down game may adversly and affect macro game health / environment. But some of them are also missing info (because of their distraction) and they may also be adversely affecting their wr., and not just their environment. You were one of them.

If your new data gathering 'distraction' helps your game, gives you data on which to reflect which you would not get by playing ofc, your macro effect on the game is the same, but your effect on yourself/wr is improvement.

Others get the improvement with meta game interaction focus. You have your method.

You may be underestimating whether others know, or care, and that can drag down the environment more than ofc, but that is somthing you can work on. Whether it is being friendlier, data mining less, e.g. track only people that give you issues.

But yeah your main problem could be blabbing about it.2018 NC/LC - Misteaks Were Made
02-24-2018 , 02:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by callipygian
Why would you phrase it like that, like there was some expectation that I did?
I thought this burn (intended or not) was funny

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathDonkey
Man I have such mixed feelings on this debate. TDK clearly has found something that helps him focus, which is great. But I do think he’s focusing on sorta the wrong stuff. And I do think some of his fellow players may not like the analysis of their play or the public nature of it. But he changes the names and it seems fairly harmless overall. Shrug. Do what works for you imo. And then realize there might be some over analysis at work
Yup. Many little pictures are still smaller than the big picture. Hard for me to know which is which sometimes.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jdr0317
24/17 for life IMO
blood in, blood out
02-24-2018 , 02:53 AM
U of A and Sean Miller
02-24-2018 , 03:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdr0317
24/17 for life IMO
I'm at 31.7/18 after 2400 hands.
02-24-2018 , 12:19 PM
You just really want me to insult you, yes?
02-24-2018 , 03:31 PM
Isn't that our thing? My small sample size is heavily influenced by having position on people that are playing 60+% of their hands. I think if you aren't opening up your starting range in those spots you are leaving money on the table.
02-24-2018 , 03:59 PM
Seems like you are calling a lot.
02-24-2018 , 04:23 PM
Calling ev is the gravy of poker profits, it's easy to spill if you put too much on your plate.

      
m