Quote:
Originally Posted by chillrob
Well if that was the case, the dealer certainly did a very poor job of stopping the action, and the walker still shouldn't get to play his hand.
Under no circumstance is the walker ever playing his/her hand. That's a given.
But if the dealer tried to stop the action - no matter how poorly a job was done - I wouldn't stiff him/her for an extended period of time. Because if in his/her mind they did things right, they're going to blame you.
Fundamentally, if I do stiff a dealer, it's a reminder of my previously voiced displeasure, not a punishment. Using it as a punishment leads to all sorts of misinterpretations, like, "oh he's just mad because he lost the hand and he blames me" which will end up getting passed on to the other dealers. Attribution of cause is a huge problem to any complex subject which is boiled down to a single number - tipping, college admissions, Christmas bonuses, etc. Unless you give an itemized list of reasons, it's more than likely that whatever punishment or reward you try to implement will be misinterpreted.