Originally posted in response to the question how “good” the software currently is:
Quote:
Originally Posted by sorrow
HUD:
The HUD has become mature very quickly - its the most polished part of fpdb at the moment, with much of eratosthenes and ekdikeos time going towards this. I think it rocks personally, but i'm sure its not feature complete compared to HEM or PT [1]
It supports stacking, configurable stats display, color and transparency (next release for transparency) and has been run with up to 16 stacked tables by Eliatic Stranger under linux without putting CPU over 50%.
This is a little out of date, but it might be worth my elaborating on my experience with the HUD. These comments might be useful to people who are wondering how usable the software is. I’ve kept up to date with the Git repository, so my comments apply to the current version.
I use the HUD with MySQL, and installed it without problems (on Linux). (Note: One has to be careful to follow the instructions in the README.) I use it when playing NLHE cash games on Pokerstars (though not on any other site, since I don’t play on them) and find it extremely useful.
Even on my rather slow laptop (with its pretty miserable 512 Mb of memory) it doesn’t slow the game down. The load on the system when the HUD is running is quite reasonable. There were some posts of mine earlier complaining about excessive CPU usage, but this is all sorted out in the current version and these problems have vanished. Normally I play on eight tables; but a few days ago I decided to kill some time (and try an experiment) by playing a session of 20 micro-stakes tables and the HUD still ran smoothly.
As it happens, the minor problem I reported earlier that some of the statistics windows were occasionally appearing out of place has stopped occurring.
I have tried the opacity setting for the HUD windows as well. It works as advertised. I have switched it off again, however, as I don’t see a compelling need for it.