Originally Posted by RivFader
What do you all think is a reliable samplesize for the 3-bet stats?
I haven't done or read any studies on this, but I imagine at least several hundred hands would be required before this gets anywhere near accurate.
Originally Posted by hammond
I would like to suggest an aesthetic improvement. In the limit column, I think no limit and pot limit games should be listed by their SB and BB just like limit. In forums I have seen no limit games with $1/$2 blinds listed (often incorrectly) as $2NL, NL$2, $200NL and NL$200. As the short stacking debate has proven, everyone isn’t buying in for some standard 100 BB so naming the game that way is flawed. And naming the game by only the BB just further muddles the situation. These differences and confusions don’t happen in limit. In limit the game is universally called $1/$2. So labeling the no limit games in the columns as $1/$2 NL would make everything clear as well as line up nicely.
Currently we are using "$BigBlind NL". We originally started with "$SB/$BB NL", but some sites don't record the small blind information for NL games so we changed it. We will be consistent with it.
Originally Posted by River_Mitt
Also, be nice to have Limit and NL grouped seperately in the limit column, as far as that goes.
I'm not sure what you mean by this. PT3 currently keeps the NL and Limit games in separate limits.