Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
PokerTracker 3 PokerTracker 3

05-23-2008 , 03:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by notreallymyname
This one's weird: I just had to add my pokerstars name to my aliases although it was already in there. It's now in there twice. I have no idea what triggered this.
Since you haven't even acknowledged this, I presume you think I'm mad or hallucinating. PT3 is really creating duplicate player entries, and I just queried the database to confirm this:

PT3 DB=> SELECT count, COUNT(*) FROM (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM player GROUP BY player_name, id_site) a WHERE count > 1 GROUP BY count;
count | count
-------+-------
5 | 1
4 | 3
3 | 18
2 | 45
(4 rows)

Further queries showed that the rows are identical apart from the id_player column.
05-23-2008 , 03:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PokerAce
Quote:
Originally Posted by DMoogle
FTP's deep HU tables are being imported as regular tables (i.e. suggesting they are FR).
If the hand histories don't specify that the hands are heads up, PT3 doesn't automatically make them 2 max. You can click the "Adjust Qualifying Tables Limits" option in the auto-import preferences and it will mark these as 2 max.
But they are specified. It says (deep hu) in the HH. e.g.:

Full Tilt Poker Game #6476255446: Table Bayou (deep hu) - $1/$2 - No Limit Hold'em - 3:07:43 ET - 2008/05/19
Seat 1: xxxxxxxxx ($572.50)
Seat 2: yyyyyyyyy ($286.85)
xxxxxxxxx posts the small blind of $1
yyyyyyyyy posts the big blind of $2
The button is in seat #1
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to xxxxxxxxx [Ah Ac]
xxxxxxxxx raises to $6
yyyyyyyyy calls $4
*** FLOP *** [Th Jh 5d]
yyyyyyyyy checks
xxxxxxxxx bets $8
yyyyyyyyy calls $8
*** TURN *** [Th Jh 5d] [4c]
yyyyyyyyy checks
xxxxxxxxx bets $24
yyyyyyyyy calls $24
*** RIVER *** [Th Jh 5d 4c] [6s]
yyyyyyyyy checks
xxxxxxxxx bets $60
yyyyyyyyy folds
Uncalled bet of $60 returned to xxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxx mucks
xxxxxxxxx wins the pot ($75.50)
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $76 | Rake $0.50
Board: [Th Jh 5d 4c 6s]
Seat 1: xxxxxxxxx (small blind) collected ($75.50), mucked
Seat 2: yyyyyyyyy (big blind) folded on the River
05-23-2008 , 07:04 PM
i'm wondering about the same thing. If they dont include DB hands and only show 30 observed hands out of memory scanner before i sit down, i will be very disappointed and switch to another tracking program. Is this feature certainly included in the next release? Folks, i really want it back for my table selection on stars,please
Quote:
Originally Posted by l0gician
Well I made it rather clear I didn't care about the 30 hands and wanted to know about my DB hands. In the PT3 forums and in here I got the same 30 hand response, no mention of, yes of course your DB hands will be included.
05-23-2008 , 07:27 PM
In short, you will see all stats like in PT2, and additionally you CAN datamine 30 hands before you sit at the table.

Stars have a strict policy that prohibits datamining, but they gave permission to PT3 to mine 30 hands before you actually start playing.
05-23-2008 , 10:26 PM
is it worth buying now or should i wait?
05-23-2008 , 11:29 PM
buy it now

updates are free (i would hope)
05-23-2008 , 11:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by notreallymyname
Since you haven't even acknowledged this, I presume you think I'm mad or hallucinating. PT3 is really creating duplicate player entries, and I just queried the database to confirm this:

PT3 DB=> SELECT count, COUNT(*) FROM (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM player GROUP BY player_name, id_site) a WHERE count > 1 GROUP BY count;
count | count
-------+-------
5 | 1
4 | 3
3 | 18
2 | 45
(4 rows)

Further queries showed that the rows are identical apart from the id_player column.
unbelievable
05-24-2008 , 02:47 AM
is there any way i can try out table tracker without having to buy pt3 first? i'm trying to decide between PT3 and HEM
05-24-2008 , 03:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ra]\\[dom
In short, you will see all stats like in PT2, and additionally you CAN datamine 30 hands before you sit at the table.

Stars have a strict policy that prohibits datamining, but they gave permission to PT3 to mine 30 hands before you actually start playing.
There we go again with the 30 hands...
05-24-2008 , 03:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkMagus
is there any way i can try out table tracker without having to buy pt3 first? i'm trying to decide between PT3 and HEM
I think PT3 has 5k trail
HM you'll have to check the HM thread, when there is trail, he'll post it.
05-24-2008 , 03:55 AM
I want to delete/purge the older hands from my mined database as it's getting pretty huge (just converted it to pt2.) What is the best way to do this? The DB is about 5m, i wanna purge the oldest 1.5m ish.
05-24-2008 , 05:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by l0gician
There we go again with the 30 hands...
You DO know what datamining is, right? (Getting handhistories for hands on tables you're not sitting it).

PT3 is perfectly capable of showing ALL the stats for ALL the players at a table, whether you sit down or not. At PokerStars it's just not capable of reading more than 30 hands on that you're not sitting at...
05-24-2008 , 06:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PietM
You DO know what datamining is, right? (Getting handhistories for hands on tables you're not sitting it).

PT3 is perfectly capable of showing ALL the stats for ALL the players at a table, whether you sit down or not. At PokerStars it's just not capable of reading more than 30 hands on that you're not sitting at...
Get this... I have a huge... datamined....database...! I don't give a crap about 30 hands. When I ask if PT is going to be able to use the mem scanner like it used to, I'm talking about displaying the thousands of hands I have on players (before I sit), not that last 30 that stars allows being mined. The only reason this is getting brought up again is because someone working on PT3 said no, ONLY 30 hands.
05-24-2008 , 06:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevi3p
I'm 99% sure there is a bug here. I ran a SQL query in pgadmin looking at cases where amt_won<0 in cases where somebody "won" the hand and went to showdown. It returned many cases which didn't make sense. Here's one:

<HH>

It seems to include cases where somebody goes all in, has them covered, they call and they win. PT3 seems to think that the all-iner wins a side-pot, when all that's happened is money has been returned. I play on Party and Ongame and noticed the problem occurring on both sites.
Agreed - I just tested this single HH and both players are recorded as 100% W$SD. Please attach this HH to the Support system and describe the issue.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Falc
I just bought PT3 and when importing I get alot of
errors, like 3 errors/file or so. Those hands have been imported fine and with no errors when using the beta. I've opened a ticket on the website with errors and handhistories, I'm just wondering if this is a known issue? ETA on fix?
These errors are hands with incorrectly formatted histories - usually the preflop actions are out of order or something.
If you have HHs which you think are correct but are not importing, please attach them to the Support system.

Quote:
Originally Posted by stevi3p
Under configure, in the Statistics tab. It didn't appear in the report (in both Table Tracker and the 'positions' tabs). It gave me the choice in the config window, and it appeared to work within that window, but ignored my choice to add it after clicking apply and close. Closing PT3 it and starting it again didn't work. Returning to the config window, the window still showed the stat as being added, but it wouldn't report - the column didn't appear at all.
The problem may be that you define your stat in a certain category (e.g. Cash Hand) but if the report is of a different type (e.g. Cash Player Statistics) then the stat won't work in the report.

Quote:
Originally Posted by l0gician
Get this... I have a huge... datamined....database...! I don't give a crap about 30 hands. When I ask if PT is going to be able to use the mem scanner like it used to, I'm talking about displaying the thousands of hands I have on players (before I sit), not that last 30 that stars allows being mined. The only reason this is getting brought up again is because someone working on PT3 said no, ONLY 30 hands.
The memory scanner is only allowed to read 30 hands from a table to determine who is seated.
THE HUD WILL USE ALL THE HANDS FROM YOUR DATABASE TO SHOW STATS, not just the 30.
05-24-2008 , 07:04 AM
Pokertracke have many Bug !!!!
many data is not a correct !!!!!!!!!!!!!
05-24-2008 , 10:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by webpower
Pokertracke have many Bug !!!!
many data is not a correct !!!!!!!!!!!!!
Could you please be a bit more specific?
05-24-2008 , 10:29 AM
Is there anyway to change the stats shown on the pop up?
05-24-2008 , 10:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RUdallas
Is there anyway to change the stats shown on the pop up?
Go to configure HUD, go to the "group" tab, select the "default pop-up" group and then go to the "stats" tab to change the stats.
05-24-2008 , 10:48 AM
awesome thanks
05-24-2008 , 11:09 AM
There is a problem with rake calcs on ongame.

There is a standard no flop no drop policy at ongame... and yet:



Texas Hold'em $4-$8 NL (real money), hand #P4-68335320-200
Table Hagen, 24 May 2008 12:16 AM ET

Seat 4: Larimani [ 7D,QS ] ($1191 in chips)
Seat 10: Mentorn ($396 in chips)
ANTES/BLINDS
Mentorn posts blind ($2), Larimani posts blind ($4).

PRE-FLOP
Mentorn folds.

SUMMARY
Dealer: Mentorn
Pot: $6, (including rake: $1)
Larimani bets $4, collects $6, net $2
Mentorn loses $2

Shows as $1 rake on the DB as well...
05-24-2008 , 03:24 PM
If the rake is in the hand history files then that's how it will be imported..
05-24-2008 , 04:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by iSTRONG
...
Pot: $6, (including rake: $1)
Larimani bets $4, collects $6, net $2
It should be easy to figure out that although Pot is $6 (including $1 rake) the winner collects $6, so the pot was not raked. Just compare the pot size to the amount won (collected).
05-24-2008 , 05:21 PM
Fievel,

it makes the rake amount inaccurate in PT.
05-24-2008 , 05:25 PM
I have Vista and am not sure which version of PT3 to download...the With PostgreSQL version or the one without it. I don't even know what postgreSQL means...
05-24-2008 , 05:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FionnMac
I want to delete/purge the older hands from my mined database as it's getting pretty huge (just converted it to pt2.) What is the best way to do this? The DB is about 5m, i wanna purge the oldest 1.5m ish.
.

      
m