PokerTracker 3 - Page 22 - Poker Software -- Two Plus Two Poker Forums

hi i was doing some datamining on fulltilt earlier, the first 100 hands imported fine , then i get this error msg: The instruction at "0x00607ac9" referenced memory at "0x006eb37c". The memory could not be written.
Click on OK to terminate the programme.
Click on CANCEL to debug the programme.

is it something wrong with my computer? or is it pokertracker 3?
Many Thanks
Lingdog

just installed beta3, still having the same problem. something wrong with my computer?
thanks
Lingdog

02-01-2008 , 08:49 AM

#528

PokerAce

See our Commercial Software thread

Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 4,309

Open the PokerTracker.log file in the main PT3 directory. The last line of the log should tell you which file it was importing before it crashed. Try importing just that file and see if it crashes. If it does, please attach that file to a support ticket on our site.

02-01-2008 , 09:18 AM

#529

lingdog

centurion

Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 167

Quote:

Originally Posted by PokerAce

sorry PokerAce, for some reason its working fine now. i opened the table manually this time, (I used spadeye to open tables last time) was it spadeye causing the problem? also when i opened the log file, i found some error msg like this one:

2008/02/01 13:00:34.125: [00002708][PostgresConnection (Error)] Unable to execute query: COPY holdem_hand_summary FROM STDIN;; Reason: Fatal Error (ERROR: duplicate key violates unique constraint "hhs-unique_hand_no" CONTEXT: COPY holdem_hand_summary, line 1: "86770 300 5 74 5076625521 2008/02/01 11:42:40 2008/02/01 13:00:34 6 2 2 2 51.75 2.55 0.43 229 5119 6..." )

is that normal?

02-01-2008 , 09:31 AM

#530

PokerAce

See our Commercial Software thread

Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 4,309

Those errors are normal, they just indicate a duplicate hand was found.

02-01-2008 , 10:22 AM

#531

Sandviper23

veteran

Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 2,823

exported old hands... now importing them into PT3

seems very slow

like takes over an hour per 10k hands.

02-01-2008 , 10:52 AM

#532

PokerAce

See our Commercial Software thread

Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 4,309

Are you doing anything else with PostgreSQL? That would cause slowdowns. Duplicates? Maybe try stopping the import and rebooting. It shouldn't be any slower than beta 2.

02-01-2008 , 12:29 PM

#533

Melchiades

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 7,045

Adding an alias seem to take a really really long time. Is this usual? Have about 350k hands in my DB. Import speeds were very impressive when I just imported them.

02-01-2008 , 12:32 PM

#534

PokerAce

See our Commercial Software thread

Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 4,309

Yes, adding an alias will take a while. This is because the alias system was designed to take the entire performance hit up front. Retrieves and inserts are as fast as they would be if there were no aliases set at all.

02-01-2008 , 12:36 PM

#535

Melchiades

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 7,045

Yeah. Just finished. And getting all stats from the 300k hands from myself under different aliases was really speedy. Impressed.

02-01-2008 , 02:10 PM

#536

Moonshine

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 4,446

Quote:

Originally Posted by PokerAce

PT3 doesn't count it as an attempt if it's called before it gets to the blinds. I'm still undecided as to if we should keep it that way or not.

woahhh that's vv bad keep it the old way

02-01-2008 , 02:20 PM

#537

chumofchance

journeyman

Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 223

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moonshine

woahhh that's vv bad keep it the old way

agree completely - why would actions taken after someone attempts to steal affect whether or not they were, well, attempting to steal?

unless you're going to filter for how often they cbet after a pt3 attempt to steal, etc., i don't see the problem with the old definition.

02-01-2008 , 02:21 PM

#538

meleader2

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 5,086

if there wasn't already i'd like to request a "post hand" feature that grabs stats on all opponents in the hand you wish to post so i don't have to find each one in the database.

i'd rather not use that web service to get this done.

02-01-2008 , 03:00 PM

#539

Jigsaws

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 5,178

Under the "hands" tab, there doesn't seem to be a way to just get a list of all hands that fit under the current filter like in PT2. That means I don't see a useful way to review 'all hands where I 3bet preflop', for example.

02-01-2008 , 03:11 PM

#540

NoahSD

Is Right

Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 18,843

Quote:

Originally Posted by fozzy71

If I understand the OP's problem correctly - The proper thing to do, is simply organize your datamined hands better. When you add a new group of datamined hands, to your main Mined HH folder, put them in their own, new folder. Then simply manually import the new mined hands, that you put in their own folder, and PT3 wont read any duplicates.

Obviously I can do this, but that's not a very clean solution. Seems like it should be pretty easy to make it skip over files it's already read that haven't been updated. HM does this, fwiw.

02-01-2008 , 05:52 PM

#541

SaiYeN

grinder

Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 549

Quote:

Originally Posted by PokerAce

PT3 doesn't count it as an attempt if it's called before it gets to the blinds. I'm still undecided as to if we should keep it that way or not.

So if CO open raises and BTN calls, it's no longer a steal attempt by the CO? That doesn't make much sense. Please change it back to the old definition.

02-01-2008 , 05:54 PM

#542

Bishop22

veteran

Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 2,784

Quote:

Originally Posted by SaiYeN

So if CO open raises and BTN calls, it's no longer a steal attempt by the CO? That doesn't make much sense. Please change it back to the old definition.

02-01-2008 , 06:23 PM

#543

Melchiades

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 7,045

02-01-2008 , 06:28 PM

#544

fozzy71

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 38,193

Quote:

Originally Posted by NoahSD

Obviously I can do this, but that's not a very clean solution. Seems like it should be pretty easy to make it skip over files it's already read that haven't been updated. HM does this, fwiw.

Right on, I understand fully. I was just trying to offer a possible solution for the short term. I also knew that HM does it that way, cuz I own that as well.

fwiw - I bought ALL 3 versions of PT2, back when I was playing all the different games.

02-01-2008 , 06:31 PM

#545

Melchiades

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 7,045

Ya, its a bit strange it actually spends more time going through a file thats already in the DB than importing a new one.

02-01-2008 , 06:41 PM

#546

goofyballer

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 70,719

When you add UB support, are you going to include handgrabbing functionality similar to what's currently in PA HUD?

02-01-2008 , 07:16 PM

#547

DrewOnTilt

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 7,748

I am running my first auto-import now. I can't seem to find a way to move processed Stars files and processed Full Tilt files to separate folders. Is this not possible in PT3? I really want to be able to keep my hand history files organized (by site, limit, observed vs. played, etc).

02-01-2008 , 07:27 PM

#548

DrewOnTilt

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 7,748

Issue discovered - when PT3 finds an "Unrecognized Game Type" - ex. 7-Card Stud Hi - it skips the hand import but still moves the file during the "Move Processed Files To" function. This should not happen, as I will not be able to import the hands into PTStud unless I manually move or import them from the "Processed" folder.

02-01-2008 , 07:28 PM

#549

APerfect10

old hand

Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 1,273

Quote:

Originally Posted by SaiYeN

So if CO open raises and BTN calls, it's no longer a steal attempt by the CO? That doesn't make much sense. Please change it back to the old definition.

I think everyone is misunderstanding what Josh wrote.

In the scenario you posted above, it is still a steal attempted by the CO (albeit a failed one). However, the players in the blinds, it is no longer be considered as a steal defense opportunity which makes the most sense to me. You are not defending any longer since the button called.

Best regards,

Derek