Quote:
when i compare 2 simulations which diffrent betsize where sim1 is easy implementbale, sim2 a bit harder but sim2 has a higher ev, lets say 5bb/100 more than sim1,
its hard for me to messure which bb/100 amount is big and which is small if u looking at the bigger picture. so which bb/100 diffrence or ev diffrence i can neglect and when i should be careful .
do you have any rough guideline for this? for example on the flop everyhting about 10bb/100 diffrence in ev is a big thing
i know there are other factors like how many mistakes make the population vs these 2sims, how much they punish a simpler strat and so on, but i just want to solve the ev question here for me.
Because im complete clueless how I messure a bb/100 , ev difference and come to a conclusion if I choose sim1 or sim2
Well, it is a judgement call. One point of reference is that at 5/10 game in a postflop pot rake is 30bb/100 (3$ per hand, 300$ per 100 hands. That means that gain smaller than 15bb/100 for one player is smaller than rake paid. It's still a judgement call but maybe you find it useful.
Quote:
I was curious if pio edge currently supports up to 64cores/128 threads or if I should look to buy a lower core version?
Unfortunately right onw our fastest compile works well with up to 64 threads. This means 64 cores without hyperthreading. We tried making a compile working with more threads but it was very inefficient in our tests. Hyperthreading is such a small gain though and the work required to make it efficient on 64cores+ht is significant so it's very unlikely to happen. If there is 64core ThreadRipper it will be the best to disable hyperthreading on it to get max performance with Pio.
One good thing is that Pio will be much faster in foreseeable future and that coupled with improving hardware will make huge difference.
Quote:
Some sell ranges that are labelled as "6max preflop gto ranges".
Is that possible? I have strong feeling it is sort of scam.
I answered it several posts back. There is software on the market that produces 6max GTO approximations. There are many concessions to make it possible (abstractions to lump hands together, algorithms with no guarantee of convergence etc.). If those solutions are good or not reamins to be seen. I don't have any opinion on it other than I tend to believe claims Monker author made (no guarantee of convergence, abstractions but some nice properties like pure strategies being right).
Quote:
Does pio count on card removal?
I am not sure what you are asking. We are of course taking card removal into account when solving, calculating equity or EV. I can't imagine doing it without taking card removal into account as it's such a fundamental part of poker and influences solutions in great deal.
Quote:
Given the current way pio calculates preflop, how much memory would it take to build a very simplistic 6-max tree, say 1 size/1 raise allowed pre, only 2 players postflop etc. ?
You can kinda estimate but looking at number of preflop exits in such a tree and multipliying by how much currently one preflop exit takes. I think it won't be feasible without introducing abstractions to reduce memory usage.
Quote:
what is analysis>runouts aggregated frequencies analysis over multiple files?
im assuming its aggregate data pulled from the scripts , like the aggregate flop cbet stat etc?
Yes, please look at FAQ question, here;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Ozjfnatwms (question number 5, links in the video descrption).
Quote:
-do i need excel to view this report?
You can use anything capable of reading .csv files. Libre Office is one good and free option.
Quote:
how do i resolve the root hand not having a weight assigned?
I am sorry I don't understand what root hand is. In general you need to run a script first and then run a report over the produces solutions.