Hi,

I downloaded the software to try it out but as soon as I opened it (a few hours later) it said my trial had expired. Is there something I can do about this as I am interested in the software but need to check that it works?

I'm having the same problem here. Version 2.56b and running Vista Ultimate 64.

Is anyones party site closing down for no reason while dataming?

It happened to me a few times when i wasnt playing, so it didnt bother me, i just learnt not to touch the 'puter for three hours or so.

But now, it is happening a lot, particularly when i am playing, datamining, and have pt and pahud running. Sometimes when i just touch a button on the taskbar, then i am disconnected from party. Some message comes up saying 'switch to' or ignore or something like that.

I have 1G of ram, and the cpu is running 100% when pt is importing. I am about to upgrade to 3 or 4 gig, which should hopefully help the problem

Anyone else have any ideas?

It kinda sucks now since it happens WHILE i am in a hand!

If you have problems while datamining i suggest you to do the following:

1) Go to "main"->"options"->"general" and tick "act as tableopener only".
2) Use JukOfYorks FreePHG to retrieve the handhistory files:
http://www.jukofyork.com/freephg.htm

This method efforts the least CPU power.

Does your firewall block SpadeEye from the internet?
The trial period is saved online, so the trial need to be able to contact our server.
Or probably our server was down.

Whats your machinecode, so i can take a closer look?

I am also noticing that SpadeEye is randomly putting me on wait lists. Specifically the 5 max "reserved" tables. Every single time I have it open tables datamining then stop it (w/ FT), then have it scan and I start getting on waitlists, SpadeEye puts me on random waitlists.

Anyone else have this problem?

Thanks for replying. The code is 'SGKL-LFHM-KE'. The firewall isn't blocking SpadeEye.

I haven't tried the software in the past or anything like that.

SpadeEye randomly puts me on waitlists also, most of the time it is for the 8max "pro" tables on FT... annoying but not a huge deal for me.
I posted about it in this thread a whilea go, and no one said a word about it...

Anyone experiencing freezing problems with Fulltilt?
I have HE Manager importing and SpadeEye reading from that database. When SpadeEye begins its interval scan, my FTP tables freeze for 5-10 seconds. FTP lobby also become very slow, when I try to switch to it, it renders very slowly in like 10 seconds.

I also have RealTime HUD running, but dont' think that's the problem.

In my SpadeEye lobby I have some players' "Won" columns displaying wrong values. Wrong values as in totally off. (e.g -42238 instead of +650)

I'm using a postgresql HE Manager database. The number of hands match with the database. Most players' stats are correct, just a few players with blatantly wrong "Won" column values.

I am having the sample problem with party closing down randomly while mining. I use a C2D2.8 Ghz and 2GB ram (should be enough right)
Also, can you change the fact that the party client changes the Appearance -> Effects setting for showing contents of windows?

Yes, this would mean a pretty big change on the codebase.

What about an option to just display new players (in regard to a previous scan) bold?

This ID is not in our database.
So it looks like SpadeEye can not contact our server.
Are you sure there is not something blocking it?

Hm, i somehow overlooked this issue.

Can you describe after what action it does this?
After datamining, while datamining, ...?

What SpadeEye version is this?

I guess its probably a problem with Cent values and the divider between Dollar and Cent.
What stake is this?

The Party client changes your windows appearance effects settings?
Wow, I never noticed that, and don't like it
Unfortunately i guess i can not prevent Party from doing that.

$1/$2 @ Fulltilt

I have experienced this immediately after launching spadeeye and doing a scan. Before even opening up any tables.

This happens while datamining for me. And the sleep issue I posted in your forum is happening after my computer has been idle for an hour or more....

If spadeye cant remember our particular layout when it closes (which i kinda doubt as all other programs can do it), can you please have a situation where you can choose (say on the options menu), the size of the middle screen. Ie if we are playing hu, we tick the 2player button, and the screen then shows us two players

Tick the 6max button, and the middle layout will only show us 6 seats.

Tick the full ring button and there is enough space for 10 seats

WOuld be easy to code, and be much better on the eyes! I think most of us would be getting rid of the bottom screen and playing 6max

Mr_Snood - not that it really matters or anything, but is there any way to read if players are sitting out when SpadeEye is datamining? I have two tables that keep closing and re-opening because 3 people are sitting out, is there any way to make it so it doesn't re-open when there are no hands being played?

(This is at FTP if it matters)

v2.59 does not work for me

When i run it, the tablenames that are open are in bold, which is really good, but all other numbers (except for player numbers and ave pot), are zero. My old version works very well.

Any one else having probs with this that can sort me out?

Any ideas?

Also, any chance of having a tickbox so that all open tables are up the top, and a 'mini scan' button that just scans the open tables?

I dont datamine at all.
It happens after a scan, or after I hit the join button for another table.

I hit the join button in spadeeye, so it will highlight the table in the FT lobby, then I just click on that table, and click add to waitlist.

it happens probably 80-90% of the time for me.

not really sure how else to describe it or if you want/need other information...

Unfortunately it is not easy to retrieve if a player is sitting out.

Maybe your database settings in the new SpadeEye got lost (main->options->databases)?

This sounds pretty complicated and i am not sure what such a function is good for.
Isn't the aim of a tableselection tool to find the best available tables?
Why constrain on the open tables?