edit : if I start the program the x and y coordinates pops up for a sec w/o results

Hmm, that's very strange. I use a third party Graph component so i don't really know what's going on there.

cool program , works fine now

I had an older version .

Thanks mate!!! Btw, your program is amazing!

Small request for graphs, if you are still developing this software. At current state tournament version is quite useless, one coin flip in heads up can make difference go positive even though you have had lots and lots bad luck. Using BB mode helps, but it still no do not reflect real situation. I would suggest you to include mode where every all-in is made with virtual 1000 chip stacks or something similar.

Is it possible to get this to work without poker tracker?

Everything is possible - Toyota. :-)

The question are: How much (effort) will it cost? Is somebody willing to spend the effort? Will anybody honor this effort? Won't it be cheaper to buy pokertracker (or get one free) instead of spending hours of work? :-p

I agree tournament version is not very useful. I wrote it because a lot of ppl asked for it but I always felt it wasn't going to be that great. I don't think your suggestion would make a big difference though.

Nope. I have no plans for loading up and parsing hand histories directly.

Thanks for the response. I know it was a long shot, but it's always worth asking.

how am i messing this up?


Exception: Npgsql.NpgsqlException:
column "setting_value" does not exist
Severity: ERROR
Code: 42703
at Npgsql.NpgsqlState.<ProcessBackendResponses_Ver_3> d__a.MoveNext()
at Npgsql.ForwardsOnlyDataReader.GetNextResponseObjec t()
at Npgsql.ForwardsOnlyDataReader.GetNextRowDescriptio n()
at Npgsql.ForwardsOnlyDataReader.NextResult()
at Npgsql.ForwardsOnlyDataReader..ctor(IEnumerable`1 dataEnumeration, CommandBehavior behavior, NpgsqlCommand command, NotificationThreadBlock threadBlock, Boolean synchOnReadError)
at Npgsql.NpgsqlCommand.GetReader(CommandBehavior cb)
at Npgsql.NpgsqlCommand.ExecuteScalar()
at Common.PGDataManager.ExecuteScalar(String format, Object[] args) in C:\Projects\Common\PGDataManager.cs:line 55
at HoldemLuck.PotFinderForm.FindNewPots() in C:\Projects\HoldemLuck\PotFinderForm.cs:line 27

anywhere to download this?

BUMP

Where can I download this now?

I think you'll find it in version HEM 1.08 beta 22.That has a lot of tourney support.

where the hell is this program? I can't find it anywhere. Help?

Agreed.... where can I find this now?

Direct download link to the latest (v0.14) version: http://rapidshare.com/files/20771817...Luck-v0.14.zip

Link to PT3 forums: http://www.pokertracker.com/forum/vi...p?f=15&t=15317

Thanks

As an MTT player, I gotta tell you it's been immensely useful for me. Being able to go through downswings knowing that you were the victim of negative variance and not sucky play was an immense tonic for the soul. In fact I think I ll have to buy PT3 just to be able to use your program.

Some areas that perhaps could be improved on.

1. Putting $ev calculations based on our ICM equity would be tremendously useful. I don't know how one would go on about it though. Measuring the last all in with which you were knocked out? The all ins during the ITM stage? Probably the former I guess?

Of course another problem is that with so many MTTs and Sats, it would be difficult to incorporate all the prize structures. I guess one could start with the most common SNGs like the 45s and the 180s though.

2. Right now, the filters are very useful, but I think they re not incorprating all 180 or 45 SNGs I have played;

3. Regarding the suggestion the other player made, how about having the ability to selectively remove all ins to see your charts without certain key pots which skew the results one way or another?

Last but not least, where could I make a donation?

Thanks.

Yeah, it has some value I agree but compared to cash games, it really just gives you a feel. In cash games, you really know how how good/bad you run in $$$.

I tried this but gave up on it. My first attempt seemed to be giving wrong numbers and I couldn't figure out why. I later found that my ICM calculations were wrong in multiway pots. In any event, you can only do ICM in single table tourneys because you need the chip counts of all players in the tourney. Even if you knew that in a MTT, the calculations involved would be off the charts.

Not sure what you mean here. Do the filters not detect your 180 & 45 SNG's correctly? Does PT3 identify them as 5 table and 20 table SNG's but Tourney Luck not?

Hmm, interesting idea. I'll have to think about that. Not sure it's needed though. Perhaps a better solution is to filter by blind level.

I'm nowan on Full Tilt or nowanuno on Stars.

This is strange. It seems to indicate that the query fails because your settings database doesn't contain a settings_value column. Can't think of why that would happen. The only way I can think of is that you pointed it to the wrong database but that database would have to have a table called "settings" for this error to occur I think.

Yeah, I haven't given much thought to it, but it does seem more complicated.

How about finding a way to take into account the buy in?
I don't know what PT3 does, though I haven't been able to import my MTT results to it properly. The problem is that while I can filter according to buy in, when I try to filter according to tables, the results are based on way less games than I have actually played.
The blind level idea could work.

The reason I suggested this is because I have had a couple of runs in big tourneys and because I ve received a couple of brutal bad beats my overall results are skewed because of them. It would be neat if I could take away a couple of results and see how my chart fairs.
Done.

hi. can someon eplain the graph...ok actual and expected but th difference? how can it help me? another thing my actual winnings are way up than the expected one and i dont feel that lucky ...actually for 4 months i run very bad. Does it make a difference between a mtt suckout( hundred thousand or million chips) than a sng suckout( 1500-3000 chips) ? cause i'm quite amazed looking at my graph...i apreciate any answer and if someone want to see it i'll post my graphs. ty and good day to u all cats

And do what with it? The problem again is that I don't know what's at stake because I don't know how many players are in the tourney unless it's a sit and go. You can filter by buyin to get something similar.

Does this happen when you filter according to table in PT3 also? I know some poker sites don't do a great job of logging the table tourney type (90, 180, 45 etc') so PT logs them as multi table or such. You can override that in PT3 by entering results manually.

I'll see if I can add that when I get some free time.

Got it, thanks much

I have tried this on my last 50.000 hands cash-game because I have a bad downswing and I am almost -30 buy ins difference. Is this normal or is this really exceptional? Thanks for any reaction, I rarely post here.