I think for now you can consider these ranges irrelevant in KO tournaments and always run Nash assignment after pasting hand. We will work on these automatic ranges in upcoming updates too.

Hi. This was requested, and we are considering adding this.

However, my question is always, realistically speaking, how close can you estimate your opponent range? 50% of 88 is ~0.23%, are you saying you can put your opponent on a range with less than 1% precision?

I think there almost always exists at least 2% range of uncertainty, and more realistically it can be 5-10% for great/good players in most spots (95%+).

Weighted ranges mean that someone who needs them can basically read opponents ranges with one-digit-after-dot precision, or am I missing something?

You make some valid points about this issue Q but still still feel that its a required tool. Its not like i would ever say exactly "he is shoving 88 50% of the time" it would be closer to something like "half the time he would fold his small pair" which means instead of the calculation accounting 88 only 50% of the time in their range its is, rather can be 22, 33, 44, 55, 66, 77 and 88 are in his range "around" 50% of the time and that would obviously make a bigger difference

Hi,

Example: If I analise a hand of double or nothing 6 max turbo from microgaming in party poker structure (they have similar structures but different starting chips: 2k) do I have accurate results or do I need to create this format for this network in ICMIZER?

Thanks!

Is this hand not pasted properly just for me or is it a bug?

Winamax Poker - Tournament "DERBY" buyIn: €18 + €2 level: 5 - HandId: #709688193988952088-50-1470589277 - Holdem no limit (30/200/400) - 2016/08/07 17:01:17 UTC
Table: 'DERBY(165237159)#023' 8-max (real money) Seat #2 is the button
Seat 1: HornyBadger (10704)
Seat 2: THE FROGHERO (16091)
Seat 3: overboard (20000)
Seat 4: supertoof69 (8870)
Seat 5: mashek (27661)
Seat 6: PornoBaron (33530)
Seat 7: ForestGamp (37824)
Seat 8: marjan1231 (45770)
ANTE/BLINDS
supertoof69 posts ante 30
HornyBadger posts ante 30
THE FROGHERO posts ante 30
mashek posts ante 30
PornoBaron posts ante 30
ForestGamp posts ante 30
marjan1231 posts ante 30
supertoof69 posts big blind 400
Dealt to mashek
[4C] [4D]
PRE-FLOP
mashek raises 400 to 800
PornoBaron folds
ForestGamp folds
marjan1231 folds
HornyBadger raises 9874 to 10674 and is all-in
THE FROGHERO folds
supertoof69 folds
mashek calls 9874
FLOP
[6H] [8S] [8D]
TURN
[6H] [8S] [8D] [6D]
RIVER
[6H] [8S] [8D] [6D] [JC]
SHOW DOWN
mashek shows
[4C] [4D] (Two pairs : 8 and 6)
HornyBadger shows
[JH] [10H] (Two pairs : Jacks and 8)
HornyBadger collected 21958 from pot
SUMMARY
Total pot 21958 | No rake
Board:
[6H] [8S] [8D] [6D] [JC]
Seat 1: HornyBadger showed
[JH] [10H] and won 21958 with Two pairs : Jacks and 8
Seat 5: mashek showed
[4C] [4D] and lost with Two pairs : 8 and 6

Hi, if the payouts are the same, then you will get accurate and equal results. You can enter any stacks. Actual stacks will be used when generating SNG Coach questions for tournaments of specific types.
Changing the network won't change anything regarding results.

Hi. This hand loads for me, can you be more specific about the problem with the load?

Hey,

I just switched over from a different preflop calculator, so apologies if this is obvious for the seasoned user.
Is there a way to load multiple tournaments at once? It seems like I'm only able to load one at at time.

Thanks for your help

Please can you add the ability in the range window for specific types of hands like being able to click a button and then all pairs are selected, all suited aces etc. Also please add the ability to change the order of the custom filters instead of just placed chronologically

Hello,
This might be more like a wish, than a question, but i thought it would be worth a try.
So i dont know, how familiar you are with HM's sngwizz, but it has a really great, but imo not complete feature. It marks hands, that you have misplayed (push/fold) according to its ranges. Unfortunatly you can only assing other ranges to players one by one, or choose one of their premade ranges (like avarege, loose, agressive, tight, etc.) The problem is, you cant set the ranges to nash, and these premade ranges are way off in some spots, so you are stuck with doing it one by one, just like in icmizer (if you want to change the nash ranges).
This might be, because they dont have a built in nash calc, but anyways, i asked them, and they dont want to change it in the near future.
However, it seems like this same method could be easily implemented into icmizer, allowing players to scan very quickly, when they deviate from nash.
So are you considering intruducing something like this to icmizer? Or is there any particular reason, you don't want to?
Thanks!

Hi. Currently you can only load a single file to ICMIZER 2.
It's in our TODO list to change this in future updates, but there is no ETA for this yet.

Hi. We may add that to range editor. For now I can give a suggestion about our feature that not everyone is aware of: you can hold mousedown and hover over hands to add them, instead of clicking on them one by one. This can seriously decrease time spent in range editor.


As for order of custom filters: could you be more specific? What custom filters?

Hi. This is now on our TODO list. We plan to release it later in 2016.

Thanks for that tip that will save me some time

With regards to the custom range i mean when you select a given range like 99+, AQ+ Ajs you can save it which would appear on the right of the range screen; i would like the ability to move the custom range boxes we have in whatever order we want since we may have a range of 5% of hands and 10% of hands but then want to add 8% of hands but it would not be in range-percentage order, or whatever order we want it would simply be in chronological order of when the custom range was made

Hi , do i have to pay the whole cost of subscription or can i pay the monthly cost and cancell when i want? if i recall correctly you could do that with icmizer 1 , is it no longer possible with icmizer 2?


Nevermind i found the monthly subscription , i missed it for some reason , sorry.

Hi Garpthefist24

We didn't change anything in pricing model in ICMIZER 2 compared to ICMIZER 1, except adding a PRO plan. Basic plan has the same characteristics as ICMIZER 1.

Glad that you figured it out.

Having issues with the replayer. If I upload a HH with more than 30 hands it freezes almost every time. I'm using firefox as my browser is there another one that would work better?

Hi joeluht.

You should be able to load hundreds of hands to replayer without any freezes.
Can you please send a detailed support request to support@icmpoker.com.
If you could record a video demonstrating this freeze on your mobile phone or camtasia and attach it it would be great.
Maybe your machine is a little old?

I want to choose a "Min EV diff chips" based on the rake of the tournament that I play. How Can I know the extactly number ? and do the same with "min EV diff $"

For instance I play SNG 45P buy in : $0.91 + 0.09 (rake) and $3.19 + 0.31 (rake)

Hi. You can't really handle rake with min EV diff threshold.

This refers to profit per hand. So if you bust in the first hand, then your single hand better be able to beat the rake, otherwise it would be a negative tournament for you.

If however tournament lasts 40-60 hands, then you have plenty of time to distribute this rake over hands and make up for it and show a profit.

Just keep in mind that busting early on in a tournament before having some hands where you can outplay opponents is often very bad, and may lead to negative ROI of these short tournaments.

Hi Q,
i reviewed a hand with strange results, but i think i already got the reason. Just want to be sure.

In the following hand the nash calculation suggests, that i should push almost any 2, which seems to be way too wide.

http://www.icmpoker.com/icmizer/#QQpniz

Is my assumption correct, that this is due to the fact, that icmizer can only calculate threeway allins and that the two stacks next to me are so short, that they almost always will be allin. That would mean, that the blinds have to fold, giving me and the two short stacks dead blind money.

So i am risking 1,5BB for a potential win of over 4,5BB.

Please correct me, if i'm wrong.

Thanks,

qieng

Hi qieng

You are correct, we can only consider 3 way all-ins and in this spot 2 short stacks behind hero create an obstacle in calculation.

Since this is a chip EV calculation you can swap hero position with the HIJ and assume that that is your actual position. These 2 short stacks affect your strategy, and make your range slightly wider than HIJ calculation will suggest, but it will be much closer to reality, than the range which comes out of the situation from the link. Another appraoch—you can increase their stack size to something like 10, 7BB to get a better range idea for your position.

If it were an ICM calculation it would be much more difficult to analyze, since these 2 stacks are likely to bust and if our payouts increased that would be important, and the software would be impossible to help with precise strategy in such short stacked ICM situation.

Hi Q,

thanks for your reply.

I will definitly try your suggestions.

Regards,

qieng

hey guys. i have a question that involves both icmizer and poker tracker 4. i'm wondering if someone using both of them might be able to give me some advice. here's the situation:

i like to tag hands using pt4 while i'm playing for later review. after i finish playing, i use pt4 to filter the hands that i have tagged, then open all the hands in that report in pt4s hand replayer to review. is there anyway to get all those filtered hands into icmizer without copying and pasting each one individually? it would really cut down on the hassle/time involved with reviewing if there was.

thanks for your help!

I select all tagged HHs, click right mouse button and export them to .txt file. Then I open the file, copy and paste the hands to ICMizer and voila