Only other thing I can think of is the "no flop no drop" setting. You could test in a similar way, have one player raise 100% of the time to 99bb, other player push 100% and have the opening player fold 100%. Resulting rake should be zero for this scenario.

We didn't change anything in this regard in the beta though, I really don't expect any issues related to equity models.

hello.
Can you please tell me what is table equity?
Where can I read about it?
Sorry if this has already been asked, I couldn't find any information.

Thank you

Table equity is simply the total prize equity for all players on the active table.

For single table calculations this is equal to the sum of all remaining prizes (regular + bounties).

For MTTs this is a bit more complex. With n tables remaining each table will have roughly 1/n equity in the total remaining prize pool, assuming the stacks are somewhat balanced.

These ranges are whack, or else I am doing it wrong.

Cash Game, 9 handed, 100bb each,
1bbBB, .5bbSB
2.5x raise/8.5x3bet/23x 4bet/all in 5 bet
35% commitment.

The ranges greatly undervalue pairs, Axs and Broadway-suited and greatly overvalue Axo and Kxo.

For instance,
UTG = QQ 100%, JJ 17%, TT 4%
AKs 100%, AQs 36%, AJs 1%, KQs 14%
No other suited Aces are played, no other suited broadways are played.

Meanwhile, Axo is played and Kxo is played ... all of it.
All off suited Aces and off suited Kings are played, with some significant frequency, from Under the Gun.

K2o is played 36% of the time and KJs is not played at all.

A4o is played 36% of the time and ATs not at all, and AJs is only played 1% of the time, really?

WTF?

Please tell me that I am doing something wrong or that I am misinterpreting the results, because I like this program, but these results are whack.

It looks like you are calculating a raise-or-fold game, so there's no flat calling. In that sort of game, unless a hand actually goes all the way all-in, offsuit hands tend to do better than suited ones because of card removal.

In general, doing raise-or-fold calculations is almost useless unless stacks are suitable for push-or-fold. Also be careful with enabling flat calls in the regular version: Non all-in pots are simply checked down Postflop in that version.

If you want to check out flatting spots then take a look at the beta version with Postflop equity realization, you can actually get useful Preflop ranges for deep-stacked play there.

Hello. After the update, the auto range editing stopped working. Example: I limp 20% of the best hands. Then I put top 10% of hands into an all-in range, but the limping range continues to contain the top 10% of hands. Before the update, the range itself was edited and removed from the limp range 10% that I added to the all-in range.

Can you show that in a screenshot please? We didn't change anything in that regard.

When I added all-in hands to the line, they didn't out of the limp line. Previously, if you added hands to one line from the other, they left

The percentages in the grid and the text ranges both seem to be correct, so this appears to be a display bug with the background colors (and the legend). This may already be fixed if you simply select a different range and then switch back.

Anyway, can you please check your version number at Help: About: Installation Details?

Version of the program. Maybe I did not explain clearly. On the skinshot, the range 9,8% 66+, A8s+, KQs, ATo+, but on SB 5.1% and on BB 9.8%, that is, limp with SB 9.8% + 5.1% all-in=14.9%. That is, we should see 14.9% range. The problem is that when I entered 5.1% all-in these hands were not excluded from the limping range.
In the previous version, the program removed these hands from the limping range itself, so that the total was 9.8% (5.1% all-in + 4.7% limps). If, after setting the all-in range, you do not manually remove these hands from the limp, the calculation turns out to be incorrect

I don't know that is going on in your calculation, this is not the expected behavior and I can't reproduce this problem. The hands should obviously still be removed from one range if you add it to a different one.

If it's not too big, could you send me the save-file for that calculation on discord please?

https://www.holdemresources.net/discord

Nevermind, I found the issue now. Will do a quick fix asap.

Thanks for reporting this, should be fixed with the latest update

Thank you

Hi,

I tried to update my HRC and receive the following error:

Unable to read repository at https://www.holdemresources.net/s/up...ry/content.xml.
sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: PKIX path building failed: sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderE xception: unable to find valid certification path to requested target

can you please advise?

Thanks!

If you are trying to update to the beta then please try using the beta installer:
https://www.holdemresources.net/blog.../#installation

You currently can't update from stable -> beta through the regular updates.

Hello everyone!

How you doing?

A few months a go I posted on the 2+2 forum about an automation I made for Structure Manager

Now I'm glad to share with you about a new whole and easier way to create structures

All you have to do is to go on this link and:
https://www.pokermoney.com.br/hrc/v3/

1) Select the network

2) Put the tournament ID you want to create the structure

3) Fill the amount of starting chips

In a few secs a download of a data.json file will start

Then go to your HRC, click on "Tools" -> "Structure Manager" -> "Import"

And that is it. It is done!

If you have any suggestions or comments, please let me know

Thanks a lot!

Hey mam this is super cool. Are you scraping the data off sharkscope? If so, for WPN tournaments it gets the number of entrants wrong. Sharkscope reports the total entrants then uses a ("+ __ rentries") line which seems to be being added to your total. For instance, I played a tournament yesterday w/ 219 entires, but your structure shows 260 (219 + 51 reentries) when really it was 168 entires and 51 re-entries.

Any way to tweak that? I don't really think it changes much, but would be amazing to dial this in. Thanks!

Hello there!

I am glad you liked! I hope it helps your study

I made some changes, please let me know if it calcs total entrants correctly now.

If not, please give me the tournamend ID

Thanks!

Welp now it just has one place paid. Tournament ID 26608587 from WPN

nevermind user error. works great!

Hello,
I was wondering though a question regarding the possibilities of the new beta.
I was in late stage of tournament with ICM considerations (20 left of 750) and was in a 4 way hand from the sb where utg opened, btn called, i called from sb and bb called. BB jammed flop, btn called basically all in, and I was wondering if I am able to use the new beta of HRC to solve this multi way spot/flop play given tournament icm considerations.

You can calculate this spot, but for the Postflop part you can only display the line frequencies over all boards (e.g. the BB flop jamming frequency over all flops).

If you are interested in the strategy or EV of a particular hand / board after the flop then that's currently not possible.

After importing hands from database and doing quick analyze, would it be possible to activate copying the result grid so you can paste it into excel or directly enable csv export? We could do some nice aggregations/graphs that way.

1. How many times do I need to samples to have a really accurate response?