Sorry but I have to ask again regarding that topic. If I open a hand history in PT4 this one is shown in BB in the hand history window. If I copy this history I can paste it into the "hand" window in HRC. There the Stack sizes are shown in Chips again. After calculation I see the BB valu in outline window thats right but I'd like to see it also in the Action window instead instead of Amt. in chips.
Is that possible?

There's currently no option for that, no. I'll look into it, maybe we can switch the amt display to bbs or add a setting for that.

This would be great.
An additionally column for playerposition could be an option, too. If you load a HH with player names you just see these names. I guess this ones are in ascending order with the BB in last row but nevertheless it'd be little easier to check for the positions.
Like the Chip/BB issue it is shown in outline window but in action window too it would be great :-)

Sry for newbie question
What are representing that numbers +2.11 or +0.44
And yhy some cases it wont add combos +0.04 to the range. Its marked red


https://gyazo.com/a583d119693d9840962d7cde8a701f1a

For ChipEV calculations the EV is displayed in big blinds, e.g. +0.21 means the Ev of the displayed action is 0.21bb higher than folding. For other equity models the EV is displayed as % of table equity, for single table calculations that's equivalent to the remaining prizes.

I'd recommend you update to the latest version,you can then move your mouse over the EV entry and it will show you the direct $ EV. (You are still on version 1.4, version 2.0 is available for download on the website.)

As for slight +EV hands not being included in the default ranges: The default ranges are a Nash Equilibrium approximation, this means small imperfections in the strategy are normal. You can fix this by running additional Nash iterations using the green "Run Nash Calculation" button in the toolbar.

is there a way to see overall EV for each player (not for specific hands) when you have a range locked?

EDIT: Also wondering if there is a way to include rake for cash games

You can see the overall EV change during the hand displayed in the Outline area as "EQDiff".

For raked cashgames, select "ChipEV" as equity model during the hand setup and then enable "Raked ChipEV" in the model options.

OK thanks, not sure how i missed the raked chipEV setting. However anytime i lock a range in advanced mode here is what I see for EQDiff:

That's normal, yes. If you restrict the actions in the game setup then only a partial game tree is calculated, you can't display overall EVs in that case. You have to run a regular calculation if you need those EVs, you can still lock ranges later.

Ah ok -- yea would be helpful if that's possible as adjustments are always needed in advanced mode when flat calls are involved and those adjustments will change EVs

Just do a regular calculation for that, make the range adjustments and run an additional Nash Calculation via the green button in the toolbar to update unlocked ranges.

The last dialog page is only needed if you want to calculate partial trees, in that case we can't do overall EVs.

Ah, I see that worked! Thanks. I was always running a partial tree i guess because i would put in the openers range in the setup part.

EDIT: Last question -- does it assume rake is only collected postflop? Is there a way to calculate for rake taken preflop as well?

Hello hope this is relevant place for this.
’m creating a commentary software for online Omaha home games and what’s new to this is that I’m interested in 5card Omaha. So I’m looking for a 5 card Omaha odds calculator software, but with visible whole cards information, meaning all odds For players need to be calculated with the exemption of outs which are on hands (if that makes sense).
If you already have the calculator and would love to use your API or even purchase the calculator itself. It’s all for personal use and not for sale or something.

ping me on telegram @andriikrynin

Have not done any work on 5 card Omaha, but creating a standard odds calculator seems quite straightforward. You can contact me at helmuth@holdemresources.net for details.

Realistically though, if this is just for personal use and you don't have any special requirements regarding speed: Just wrap a standard 5-card evaluator, you need choose(5,2) * choose(5,3) = 100 evaluations to evaluate a 5-card omaha hand, that's probably still fast enough for commentary purposes.

Hi everybody,
I've just bought the software and I have a few newby questions.
The first thing I would like to use is the quick analyze option but that's what appears on the screen after I press the quick analyze button:



As you can see there are only a few hands analyzed. I changed the structure of the tournament, the options and the filters but I can't get the analyze of all hands. Is that normal?

Also, if I open a hand and analyze it as a basic hand I don't get the same response. Why on the first screenshot below I have only raise and call options and on the second one only the call and 3bet options?





Thanks in advance for your help.

Select a hand that wasn't analyzed in the bottom table, the reason why the hand wasn't analyzed will be displayed in the bottom left status line. Most likely the hand either wasn't push/fold, or the effective stacks were larger than the limit you specified.

Basic hand calculations always use push-or-fold. If the stack of the second player in the pot is larger than the first player's then that push is a 3-bet, otherwise it's just a call.

Fwiw, those are some very deep stacks for push-or-fold calculations in your examples, you probably shouldn't use push/fold strategies beyond ~15-20bb effective stacks.

Thank you very much for your answer Plexiq.

Now I understand, so if the hand includes a raise or call is not considered as a push/fold situation so it is not analyzed.
If I want to analyze a 3bet jamming situation for example I have to use the advance hand option, am I right?

Another question, why do I get different responses from quick analysis and advanced analysis?






I saw you already answered this question in a earlier post but the difference was slighter than the responses I got with this hand (0.01 vs 0.47).
I suppose the advanced analysis should take into account the payment structure since I ran it from the quick analyzed hand.

That's correct.

Small differences are normal, Quick Analyze runs a fast version of the calculation and doesn't have full accuracy.

The payouts should be carried over, but it looks like you had ChipEV selected in the second screenshot (note the EV is in [BB] in the Outline area), in that case payouts are not used at all. Select ICM (or FGS) as equity model during the hand setup and you should get the correct results.

Hello,

When building a 30-0bb strategy with 2.1bb open. 3.2x 3b, or shove all-in, the software recommends open or shove with very little (~0.1%) 3b. Is there a reason, even with AA or KK for example, shoving is recommended rather than a standard 3b? It would seem with 25-30bb 3b would be higher EV.

Ty

Yes, I had chipEV selected. With ICM model the result is correct.
Really appreciate your help, I'll get back to you if I have any further question.

is there any reason I should not be using HRC for cash games?

Just run it in Chip EV mode

Rake.

The hands end up in whatever range they have the highest EV, assuming you ran enough iterations. Having split ranges (e.g. 3b and shoves) generally gives away additional information and sometimes the split just isn't worth it, then strategies converge to using only a single range.

Was this ChipEV or some ICM calc, and did you allow flat calls against the 3b?

Chip EV. Do not believe I allowed flat-calling