Hi plexiq and thanks for the quick response,
Quote:
Originally Posted by plexiq
I'm not sure what you mean by the last part.
When I made the random stacksizes I get the stacksize-table filled with 759 stacks which are sorted by amt: 1. one biggest Stack, 759 smallest stack, just a few BBs. Because I knew I was placed in 590 I thought I should change the stacksize of every place lower 590 to a stacksize smaller then mine (which was 16k), to get a real simulation environment. The randomized stack at 590 was around 21k and got lower at places 591, 592, 593 and so on.
So I first clicked at the row of place 590 and selected an amount of rows by pressing "shift-key" and clicking at the last place 759. Same as I'd select rows in Excel...
When I pressed a keynumber afterwards, a Pop-up occured which gave me the option to
set, decrease or increase the amount of the stacks.... Then the questions written in my earlier post occured.
But now I also tried the "Shape" option and "randomizing" a few times after another. When I selelected an shape value of 0.6 the stacksize of place 590 was around 16k and got lower to place 759. This is wat I wanted to get. I think this is more easy to change the field stack sizes than by decreasing/increasing as I wrote above.
Quote:
Try generating the other stacks with different shape parameters (note the auto selected value and tune it up / down a bit), check if that makes a difference for results.
Did it. If the field is more balanced, or the grap is more flat, than the calling ranges are getting bit looser, but just a bit.
I think I got what I want, thanks.