Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
GTO+/CardRunnersEV? GTO+/CardRunnersEV?

09-21-2022 , 02:38 PM
Was running sims overnight and power went out. Opened up the solver and all of my saved ranges how vanished! Is there a way to retrive them?
GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote
09-22-2022 , 02:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TPLancaster
Was running sims overnight and power went out. Opened up the solver and all of my saved ranges how vanished! Is there a way to retrive them?
Your ranges are stored in /config/newdefs3.txt.
Most likely the full directory will be C:\Program Files\GTO\config.

Backups of this file are regularly stored to /config/backups.

To restore to an earlier state, rename one of the files in /config/backups to newdefs3.txt and store it in place of /config/newdefs3.txt.
GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote
09-22-2022 , 05:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by scylla
Your ranges are stored in /config/newdefs3.txt.
Most likely the full directory will be C:\Program Files\GTO\config.

Backups of this file are regularly stored to /config/backups.

To restore to an earlier state, rename one of the files in /config/backups to newdefs3.txt and store it in place of /config/newdefs3.txt.
Worked, Thank You!
GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote
09-22-2022 , 09:30 PM
Scy how are you?
Could it be implemented after "merge" action, solve the spot again but completely canceling the betsize (or several) not chosen?

I give an example:
B30 > 30%
B60 > 10%
B80 > 3%

I would like to Merge to B30 and then run the spot again.

This would be useful in DB mode, I understand that you could tell me to directly delete the 2 unused betsizings, but to delete them the Data of the built-in subset would be lost.

It is understood right?
GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote
09-23-2022 , 08:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mates.
Scy how are you?
Could it be implemented after "merge" action, solve the spot again but completely canceling the betsize (or several) not chosen?
I give an example:
B30 > 30%
B60 > 10%
B80 > 3%
I would like to Merge to B30 and then run the spot again.
This would be useful in DB mode, I understand that you could tell me to directly delete the 2 unused betsizings, but to delete them the Data of the built-in subset would be lost.
It is understood right?
You can either entirely remove the two unused bet sizes from the tree, and rebuild the database from the edited tree.
Or edit individual trees in the database, and use the "merge" feature in the editor to merge any actions as you see fit.
GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote
09-23-2022 , 11:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by scylla
You can either entirely remove the two unused bet sizes from the tree, and rebuild the database from the edited tree.
Or edit individual trees in the database, and use the "merge" feature in the editor to merge any actions as you see fit.
The problem with the merge is that if I have 2 bets with a large gap between them, it would be a "mistake" to merge them.
Example:
B30 is used 30%
B50 6%
B75 36%

Eliminating options we lose the report inside the solver of the DB.

Merging the 2 options does not end up being optimal, because the adaptation of the other player to the new frequencies / sizes would be missing.

So neither of the 2 cases would solve this problem within a database.

What it proposed was to be able to select the merge of 2 or more betsizes to only 1 and solve the spot again (canceling the other options).
If for example I merge 2 bet frequencies to a larger size, it would be an exploitable error, because in theory it should up the % checking range.

This is solved by simply leaving the bet node that we select, deleting the others nodes.--- but if we do this, the whoel DB data is lost.

By being able to resolve after merging, this should be resolved.
GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote
09-23-2022 , 08:06 PM
When I change the ranges and rebuild a database, I'd like to see the new ranges when I open the file instead of the old ranges. Is there a workaround for this?
GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote
09-23-2022 , 08:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mates.

What it proposed was to be able to select the merge of 2 or more betsizes to only 1 and solve the spot again (canceling the other options).
.
I mean, i want to nodelock 0% of B70 and B50 (without delete) and unlock the B30 and check line
GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote
09-24-2022 , 02:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mates.
The problem with the merge is that if I have 2 bets with a large gap between them, it would be a "mistake" to merge them.
Example:
B30 is used 30%
B50 6%
B75 36%

Eliminating options we lose the report inside the solver of the DB.

Merging the 2 options does not end up being optimal, because the adaptation of the other player to the new frequencies / sizes would be missing.

So neither of the 2 cases would solve this problem within a database.

What it proposed was to be able to select the merge of 2 or more betsizes to only 1 and solve the spot again (canceling the other options).
If for example I merge 2 bet frequencies to a larger size, it would be an exploitable error, because in theory it should up the % checking range.

This is solved by simply leaving the bet node that we select, deleting the others nodes.--- but if we do this, the whoel DB data is lost.

By being able to resolve after merging, this should be resolved.
Ok, I will consider it for future releases.
GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote
09-24-2022 , 02:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dial
When I change the ranges and rebuild a database, I'd like to see the new ranges when I open the file instead of the old ranges. Is there a workaround for this?
A file consists of a single main tree, and the database.
It's indeed possible for the main tree to be different from the database.
I'll see if we can make some changes, so that, in case of rebuilding the database, the main tree is updated as well.
GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote
09-27-2022 , 11:16 AM
Apparently I am too stupid to find the "Edit Action buttons" switch. Where is it, please!
GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote
09-27-2022 , 01:28 PM
What r the .json files?

Sent from my SM-A528B using Tapatalk
GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote
09-27-2022 , 04:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by disident
What r the .json files?Sent from my SM-A528B using Tapatalk
These are files from HRC with ranges/ICM settings that can be imported into GTO+.
GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote
09-27-2022 , 04:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigdog63
Apparently I am too stupid to find the "Edit Action buttons" switch. Where is it, please!
Are you perhaps referring to the "Lock+edit decision" button?

]
GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote
09-28-2022 , 02:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by scylla
Are you perhaps referring to the "Lock+edit decision" button?

]
No I was referring to the button for "Edit action colors"
GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote
09-28-2022 , 10:54 AM
Found it: it is the Tree Editor


Quote:
Originally Posted by bigdog63
No I was referring to the button for "Edit action colors"
GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote
09-28-2022 , 02:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigdog63
Found it: it is the Tree Editor
Yes, that's correct.
The colours of the actions can be edited under the editor.

GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote
09-30-2022 , 08:41 AM
hello Scylla, is there a similar option on GTO+ that allows you to cap the number of bets / raises ?

GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote
09-30-2022 , 11:27 AM
Hi scylla,
I have some questions and offers that I think are hugely upgrading the software and IMHO are pretty easy to implement and wpn't require huge changes, and of course would be really useful and appreciated if added:

1. At the main matrix it's possible to filter a range of hands by their strength and make this group to appear in the matrix and the combos list on the left, if it would be possible to filter hands in the matrix and the combos list also by suit that would be very useful:


2. I've noticed that equity graph and EV vs equity graph (that can be viewed for each player individually which is great) has been added and this is a great addition to the analysis tools available in the software, now that the infrastructure has laid it would be amazing if it would be possible to add just another scatter graph that will measure each hand in IP\OOP for blocker\unblocker score from 0 to 1, which means to measure for blocker score how much EV is removed from villain's hands with greater equity due to the card removal effect of hero's hand and how much EV is not removed from villain's with lower equity than the combo examined for unblocker score. I honestly can't explain how useful this data will be when presented (and if the software was open sourced I would add this feature by myself) and this is just an add on to already existed feature.

3. Is it possible to lock a certain drill in the play against a solution feature? for example if I have a subset of solved trees and I want to train on a certain spot in the tree for the whole subset for example facing a turn CB IP and I want each hand will start from that spot for each solved flop, is it possible?

As always, thanks for listening and keep up the great job you're doing.
GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote
09-30-2022 , 04:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeuceOTR
Hi scylla,
I have some questions and offers that I think are hugely upgrading the software and IMHO are pretty easy to implement and wpn't require huge changes, and of course would be really useful and appreciated if added:
1. At the main matrix it's possible to filter a range of hands by their strength and make this group to appear in the matrix and the combos list on the left, if it would be possible to filter hands in the matrix and the combos list also by suit that would be very useful:
2. I've noticed that equity graph and EV vs equity graph (that can be viewed for each player individually which is great) has been added and this is a great addition to the analysis tools available in the software, now that the infrastructure has laid it would be amazing if it would be possible to add just another scatter graph that will measure each hand in IP\OOP for blocker\unblocker score from 0 to 1, which means to measure for blocker score how much EV is removed from villain's hands with greater equity due to the card removal effect of hero's hand and how much EV is not removed from villain's with lower equity than the combo examined for unblocker score. I honestly can't explain how useful this data will be when presented (and if the software was open sourced I would add this feature by myself) and this is just an add on to already existed feature.
3. Is it possible to lock a certain drill in the play against a solution feature? for example if I have a subset of solved trees and I want to train on a certain spot in the tree for the whole subset for example facing a turn CB IP and I want each hand will start from that spot for each solved flop, is it possible?
As always, thanks for listening and keep up the great job you're doing.
Ok, thank you for the feedback.
I will consider it for future releases.
GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote
09-30-2022 , 04:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by robinet
hello Scylla, is there a similar option on GTO+ that allows you to cap the number of bets / raises ?
In the LHE tab you can indeed set a cap to the number of bets on the flop/turn/river.

In the "Advanced" tab, you can enter 0 for specific bets/raises that you want to leave out.
See the screenshot below.

GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote
10-01-2022 , 01:58 AM
Is there a way to add a search feature to the list of ranges? Would make things easier to find a specific one when you have 100's of created ranges listed.
GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote
10-01-2022 , 02:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bballwiz
Is there a way to add a search feature to the list of ranges? Would make things easier to find a specific one when you have 100's of created ranges listed.
The best thing to do is to organize the ranges into categories and sub-categories.
We could add a search feature, but in my experience, most users use very complex names for their ranges.
GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote
10-02-2022 , 04:42 PM
Make it possible to display % not from % of the category, but from the category as 100%.

GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote
10-03-2022 , 01:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alexx_Bk
Make it possible to display % not from % of the category, but from the category as 100%.
Ok, I'll see if we can add a toggle "relative/absolute" here.
GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote

      
m