Just wanted a shout out that developing a simplified strategy is great with this software.
Think that is what NG was referring to above.
I pick a flop, enter ranges (with a few deviations from simple pre flop ranges, even multi way), lock all actions for first run, that I think I should do, and population would do.
I have notes from coaching to help me understand which flops are good to cbet, good for merged ranges, ranges to expect from deep stack play, etc.
I haven't been playing while building these solutions. Solutions run from 5nl to 50nl (Ignition).
After the lock, I save the file, and run the Nash file (note, SRPs for CO and later take awhile to run on my little laptop). I note the ev difference.
I make notes of the differences in calling, raising, etc., then load the saved locked file.
and unlock villain. If there are significant differences between equilibrium and my lock file, I take a screen shot, and change my locked actions to correspond better. I then run again, noting changes in EV. usually, its the same as my locked file, or improves, but it is usually better or the same as the equilibrium.
I then run a few lock villain, unlock villain, lock me, for some granular data. I come up with the best, even if calling 3bets (so probably have lower ev than villain).
I simplify to one bet strategy for flop (easiest solution). i have the best ev I can generate for simplified solution. Saved to extensive storage. Then, I play the solutions.
Since I have been studying more than playing (bad form) for two weeks, I forgot my initial ranges. Started up a session today. got the ole ranges down, and the after actions speak for themselves.
Either I developed a balanced Nash strategy, or an exploitative strategy, but it sticks in your head if you keep practicing, and understand which flops are best for raiser, caller, and which are best for merged ranges and polarized ranges.
If you put in the effort, this pays off in dividends.