Negative.

could you add the name and path of the range in the range matrix ?

When revisiting solves, I sometimes don't remember where the selected range comes from. :-/

In that case can you be a bit more specific as to what you're referring to?

Ok, I will consider it for future releases.

Yes of course. So basically, as a very specific example, I wanted the other day to train against flops that are 8-2 Top cards, Unpaired, 2Flush, and Rainbow boards, because generally they are better for the BB defending range in a single raised pot and they also have some interesting strategies compared to flops with top cards that tend to favor the rfi's range, and obviously the lower the top card the better it is on average for the BB, as it lights up the lower half of our range. But there's exceptions. Ah5h2c and As4h3h, for example are also decent flops on average for BBs srp range, but I cannot add these flops to the flops I wanted to specially train against because selecting A top card will add in a ton of flops I am not interested in training against at the same time.

So I am basically trying to separate flops based on EV and play against the solution this way, so that I can essentially play these flops with a unique strategy compared to other flops at a higher frequency, but with the current selection tools I am limited.

If you go to the database section of "Run solver", then you should be able to de-select flops there by right-clicking them.

Oh awesome, it worked! Thank you.

I deactivated key on old pc and tried to use key on new pc and says contact support?

You can simply request a new key for GTO+ here: www.gtoplus.com/request-a-key
It will be sent to you within a few minutes of your request.

How can I deactivate a key for GTO+ and flopzilla from my old computer in order to ask the the keys for my ney PC?

For this, request a key for the new computer with our online forms.
The forms our automated, so your request should be processed within a few minutes.
www.gtoplus.com/request-a-key
www.flopzilla.com/contact.html

Hello,
still loving the software.
Is there any way to save a manually edited tree by any chance?
Thanks

Once you've built a tree using the tree builder, go to edit tree, make any changes, and save the file with whatever name you want for the edited tree. Now whenever you want to use this edited tree profile, open up this file and then start working.

For this, just create a savefile of your edited tree.

To use the tree again for a different flop/ranges/rake/etc:
1) Load the savefile
2) Set whichever flop/ranges/etc you want to use
3) Go to "Build tree->Rebuild" and click on "Rebuild with current settings"

Syclla, I asked this question long time ago and few of the other users as well:

Can we get an option to get a +-threshold frequency when playing vs the solution? If we are not within the threshold, GTO+ should give us some sort of warning that we are not within the specified frequencies. This would allow us to train our frequencies and not just to see if our decision +EV.

Imo this would be a great feature and similar to Simple GTO trainer and Lucid GTO. Unfortunately, both programs currently only work with PIO sims as an input.

Do you have any plans to add this in near future?

thanks!

Scylla, is there a txt file, like the subset files for all 1755 flops, or do I need to do this manually?

We'll add this in one of the upcoming updates.
It's not particularly difficult, but we just didn't have the time yet.

For this, just use "Add X random flops" until there's 1755 flops in your database.

Oh ok, so no flops will be repeated doing this?

No, there will be exactly 1755 unique flops.

Does GTO+ have a feature similar to Pio Solver’s “Run Outs EV Comparison”?

I'm not entirely familiar with how they named their features.
Can you please describe what the feature does?

Hey Scylla,

A question about solver speed and the number of cores:

You have mentioned that the solver speed basically scales as number of physical cores multiplied by the processing speed, and that it's specifically the number of physical cores that matter. So is there any speed benefits that the solver gains from hyperthreading? For example, on my quad core laptop, GTO+ always gets to 100% CPU utilization during solving, which means it's making use of the extra threads available. But how much exactly do we benefit from hyperthreading? Pio's creator says that for Pio, hyperthreading gives an extra 15% speed boost. What about GTO+? I'm merely curious.

At this point I have 4 cores with a 3GHz clockspeed and with the new engine, I'm already getting amazing solving speed. I can only wonder how insane it would be if I tried solving with a setup that has 32 or 64 cores with a 3+ GHz clockspeed.

Also, one more thing: I know you've said that since there are already at least 3 other preflop solvers, you don't intend on working on developing one and that you'd rather focus your efforts elsewhere. And I understand that. But I think you might be able to do much better than the competition. In the postflop solver, especially with regards to memory optimizations while delivering extreme solving speed, you've far outdone Pio. Is there scope to extend the same kind of things to a preflop solver, if you were to ever create one? Even if you don't ever intend on getting started with a preflop solver, I'm curious about how these things would work. How much of a tradeoff is it between memory optimizations and speed + accuracy?
Pio's creator said that the preflop solver struggles with converging if given overbet options in the postflop tree used. I thought that was pretty interesting.

And one other thing: what's the default solving accuracy for turns and rivers? Is it 0.5%? And is there any way to change this default value to something that's user-defined?