GTO GTO+/CardRunnersEV? - Page 451 - Poker Software -- Two Plus Two Poker Forums

Two Plus Two Forums Online Poker Sites & Marketplaces Poker Software

[GTO] GTO+/CardRunnersEV?

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 451 of 568

First

251 351 401 431 441 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 461 471 501 551

Last

Page 451 of 568

First

251 351 401 431 441 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 461 471 501 551

Last

12-24-2020 , 12:45 AM

#11251

ThaEndBoss

banned

Join Date: Dec 2020 Posts: 84

Quote:

Originally Posted by FlashDeath

In the context of using GTO+, is a dedicated server any different from a cloud instance? Would you recommend one option over the other?

Is there currently a cloud service available through GTO+?

Quote

12-24-2020 , 03:16 AM

#11252

scylla

GTO+ Representative

Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 7,353

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaEndBoss

Is there currently a cloud service available through GTO+?

We don't offer a cloud service.

Quote

12-24-2020 , 03:17 AM

#11253

scylla

GTO+ Representative

Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 7,353

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMonolith

Hi Scylla, is there a way to make a node lock to all the flops in the database?
Say you want to make oop cbet entire range (one size) on a subset of flops.
If it is possible, is it also possible on the ip side? Oop don't donk, then ip cbet entire range.
Obviously with same ranges, same stacks and same tree lines.
Thank you.

For this, just edit the tree and remove the unwanted actions.
Then, build a new database from the edited tree.

Quote

12-24-2020 , 03:19 AM

#11254

scylla

GTO+ Representative

Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 7,353

Quote:

Originally Posted by expiat

Hello, is it any way when i create a tree, and then edit it manually in some spots to save it somehow? Cause if you want to change something later and you click on build tree all the things you did manually are lost. (The changes i try to are the stacks,pot and ranges)

For this, just keep a backup of your tree.

If you want to re-use it:
1) Load the tree
2) Set any ranges/board/rake/etc that you want to use
3) Go to "Build tree"
4) Go to the tab "Rebuild"
5) Click on "Rebuild with current settings"

Quote

12-24-2020 , 05:41 PM

#11255

expiat

newbie

Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 30

Quote:

Originally Posted by scylla

Hello, i tried to create a SNG tree. But when i click on the last step to "Rebuild with current settings" i got that message.

"Tree has been successfully built!

Warning: Effective stacks had to be re-adjusted in "Stack"window."

Last edited by expiat; 12-24-2020 at 06:00 PM.

Quote

12-25-2020 , 04:40 AM

#11256

scylla

GTO+ Representative

Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 7,353

Quote:

Originally Posted by expiat

If you have a tree with betting such that the effective stacks are 781, then it's not possible to translate that into a tree where the effective stacks are 100 (you would either need to change the bet sizing, or the stacks). For this reason, the tree builder will change the effective stacks to reflect those of the original tree.

Quote

12-25-2020 , 05:17 AM

#11257

FlashDeath

enthusiast

Join Date: Nov 2020 Posts: 69

Hey Scylla,

Can you extend display method 2 from postflop range matrix to preflop as well? As it is now, even though the color intensity gives us an idea of how much a combo features in a range, we have to hover over each individual combo to really know how much of it is in there. It's very convenient when the cells are filled according to their weight. A toggle just like for the postflop matrix would be perfect.

Quote

12-25-2020 , 05:22 AM

#11258

FlashDeath

enthusiast

Join Date: Nov 2020 Posts: 69

Quote:

Originally Posted by FlashDeath

In the context of using GTO+, is a dedicated server any different from a cloud instance? Would you recommend one option over the other?

And an additional question in regards to this: Since GTO+'s licensing system ties the software to the actual physical system, I don't suppose using cloud instances is a valid option, since you just specify the system specs and they provide you one, but each time you use it's not necessarily the "same" one.

Quote

12-25-2020 , 06:58 AM

#11259

expiat

newbie

Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 30

Quote:

Originally Posted by scylla

My first tree had stack sizes 220 and pot 60 and the second that i want to use “Rebuild” has Stack sizes 190 and pot 60.

Quote

12-25-2020 , 06:30 PM

#11260

D_godfather9

newbie

Join Date: Apr 2020 Posts: 16

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dejavudu666

I feel like the entire "starting range" should show up so we can at least compare the EV difference of lines with certain combos within our range without having to node lock which is time intensive although I feel gto+ favours simplicity.

Quote:

Originally Posted by scylla

We can consider it, although others may feel that only the hands that are present in the ranges should be displayed. For example, if only 10 combos out of an original 500 combos make it to a certain line, then it might be distracting to display all 500 combos. That being said, I will take your suggestion under consideration.

agreed

Quote

12-25-2020 , 06:34 PM

#11261

D_godfather9

newbie

Join Date: Apr 2020 Posts: 16

having an issue with windows 10 power or sleep settings ( i think). Running flop subsets and i come back to see only 1 or 2 done before GTO stopped progressing. Once I click back into GTO it finalises and commences the next hand.

Have tried power and screen on never sleep. Is there another setting causing me an issue? I don't think I encountered this issue before but no idea what has changed.

Or could I be hitting a limit of CPU or memory causing GTO to pause?

Quote

12-26-2020 , 03:01 AM

#11262

jaym99

newbie

Join Date: Dec 2017 Posts: 36

Quote:

Originally Posted by expiat

My first tree had stack sizes 220 and pot 60 and the second that i want to use “Rebuild” has Stack sizes 190 and pot 60.

+1 on this, it would be great to be able to save a manually edited tree as a profile so we could use it for other stack depths.

Quote

12-26-2020 , 05:56 AM

#11263

scylla

GTO+ Representative

Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 7,353

Quote:

Originally Posted by FlashDeath

Ok, I will consider it for future releases.

Quote

12-26-2020 , 05:57 AM

#11264

scylla

GTO+ Representative

Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 7,353

Quote:

Originally Posted by FlashDeath

It's indeed a requirement that the software is consistently used on the same computer.

Quote

12-26-2020 , 05:58 AM

#11265

scylla

GTO+ Representative

Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 7,353

Quote:

Originally Posted by expiat

My first tree had stack sizes 220 and pot 60 and the second that i want to use “Rebuild” has Stack sizes 190 and pot 60.

Yes, because of this, the stacks will need to be reset to 220.
Otherwise, it's not possible to re-use the earlier tree.

Quote

12-26-2020 , 06:00 AM

#11266

scylla

GTO+ Representative

Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 7,353

Quote:

Originally Posted by D_godfather9

This was indeed an issue in one of the earlier versions.
Are you using v132?

Quote

12-26-2020 , 06:58 AM

#11267

mike1270

adept

Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 1,078

Quote:

Originally Posted by scylla

Thanks, I will try that

Quote

12-26-2020 , 09:02 AM

#11268

D_godfather9

newbie

Join Date: Apr 2020 Posts: 16

Quote:

Originally Posted by scylla

This was indeed an issue in one of the earlier versions.
Are you using v132?

oh...no, should it update automatically, i am on 1.2.9

Quote

12-26-2020 , 09:20 AM

#11269

scylla

GTO+ Representative

Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 7,353

Quote:

Originally Posted by D_godfather9

oh...no, should it update automatically, i am on 1.2.9

Yes, updating to v132 should resolve this issue.

Quote

12-26-2020 , 12:22 PM

#11270

D_godfather9

newbie

Join Date: Apr 2020 Posts: 16

resolved. Thank you for support over holiday season.

Quote

12-26-2020 , 08:39 PM

#11271

tuffspotz

centurion

Join Date: Sep 2015 Posts: 119

Dear Scylla,

I am wondering is there a way to precisely test the EV of adding different river bet sizes in gtoplus? If we add/remove a river bet size and then re run the tree, the solver might adjust its earlier nodes, so it wouldn't be possible to say the difference in the river EV is a direct effect of the change in bet sizes. is there a way to hold the entire tree up to the river static? i see if we lock the tree the EV is no longer displayed.

Thanks!

Quote

12-27-2020 , 04:34 AM

#11272

scylla

GTO+ Representative

Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 7,353

Quote:

Originally Posted by tuffspotz

This is currently not possible. However, I can tell you that when playing GTO, all bet sizes will perform almost exactly the same. You can test this for yourself by building the same tree, but for different sizes. After that, check OOP's overall performance (check his EV for his very first decision below the table; see the screenshot below). As you'll find, the overall EV will be nearly identical, regardless of which bet sizes are used.

Quote

12-27-2020 , 09:44 AM

#11273

merkutio137

newbie

Join Date: Sep 2019 Posts: 19

Hello Scylla. Do I understand correctly that you are considering to implement "partial node locking" feature next year? Can you indicate the approximate dates (first quarter, six months or ...)?

Quote

12-27-2020 , 04:50 PM

#11274

scylla

GTO+ Representative

Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 7,353

Quote:

Originally Posted by merkutio137

Hello Scylla. Do I understand correctly that you are considering to implement "partial node locking" feature next year? Can you indicate the approximate dates (first quarter, six months or ...)?

I've made no such statements.
I'm happy to consider it, but, as I've said previously, this feature does come with certain challenges.