Quote:
Originally Posted by realtimer
Have stumbled up on some opinions of users that suggested solving for multiple bet sizes first, then interpreting the results and looking for which size the solver prefers. Then solving only for that preferred bet size. Would that work as well to find out optimal size?
Cheers
Trying out the different single sizes would work best, given that if you want to find the optimal size, then just trying out different sizes is the most direct approach. Using multiple bet sizes may result in the solver landing on a solution where for example a 50% size and a 90% size is used most frequently for two different ranges, whereas if you were forced to use a single size for the entire range, it would have landed on 60%. In the end though, bet sizing has only a very limited influence on the overall performance, and it's far more important to focus your efforts on the quality of play.