Hi
After I played around with PIO, I tried to put the same input in both programs to see what each programs(CR-EV and PIO) GTO-strategy recommends.I put a very simple range BTNvsBB3bet and to my surprise CR-EV and PIO have different lines.
...if is GTO then we should have the same solutions nooo?
I have a tight range for simplicity (the same result with a most complex range).
We are on the flop after BB3bet and BTNcall, C-bet-33%, R=2.75x, Target dEV=0.25%
BB-range:QQ+,AK=2.56%(34 combos)
BTN-range:JJ,TT,99,AKo,AQs-AJs,KQs,AQo=4.07%(54 combos)
Flop:J
6
2
After a C-bet(58) from BB (Fq:99.8CR-EV and 99.62%PIO)...BTN response is:
-On CR-EV...21.5%Raise and he say JJ(top range) is a 100% Raise on so dry board even if EVRaiseJJ(499.76)<EVCallJJ(499.77)
-On PIO...0%Raise--->EVRaiseJJ(544.13)<EVCall(547.48)...normal line depending of EV.
Please explain why do you think that BTN strategy differs from a Cr-Ev to PIO(it is not normal if it's GTO) and why EV of JJ is not the same(499.76 vs 544.13).
Who is right Cr-Ev or PIO?
I can send you .stx file
Regards,
Horatiu
Last edited by mandea78; 03-17-2017 at 09:51 AM.