I have an odd result. I edited a tree manually. OOP always checks and IP has four possible bet sizes. I carefully edited every branch of the remainder of the tree to be "reasonable" but not too large. The resulting tree requires 5.5GB RAM.
I assigned a flop of [Jh Tc 8c] and used {BTN open, BB flats} ranges for 100bb.
I ran the solver to a 0.5% dEV.
Every single XhXh has a lower Equity (by 1%-2%) and EV of the corresponding combo of XdXd and XcXc. This is not possible, correct (unless I had assigned some weird suit-based preflop ranges)?
EDIT: I also just noticed that every flush draw combo has a slightly lower Equity and EV than XdXd and XcXc combos as well (with the exceptions of 76s, 75s, and 74s). And why are AdQd and AcQc showing somewhat different strategies? (This also persists over all hand combos)
Last edited by RiverJohn; 12-06-2021 at 03:39 PM.