Sorry, I have flopzilla on my older computer but haven't use it for a long while, will my flopzilla license get expired? I tried to use the old license key on my new computer but it doesn't work, and I have sent an email but get no reply.

Thanks in advance,
Tom

Someone else's ranges may not be entirely useful to you.
Preflop ranges are only meaningful if you have access to the relevant context.

You can request a key for your new computer here: www.flopzilla.com/contact.html
It will be sent to you within a few minutes of your request.

Should you not have received your key within 5 minutes, then please send an e-mail to support and we will generate your key for you manually.

Hardware ID?
To get your hardware ID, start Flopzilla and go to "register" in its menu.

Thanks, i got my flopzilla license and it works on my computer, your help is really appreciated.

Tom

Can you add any light into how FlopzillaPro determines HU equities when the players have overlapping ranges and part of the overlapping portion has a weight less than 100%? For example, I calculated the equities for the following:

UTG: AA-66
BTN: TT-88,[50.0000]77-55[/50.0000]
Flop: 8c7d6s

According to FlopzillaPro, UTG has 53.100% equity. But according to PokerRanger2, UTG has 52.48% equity.

Now when I set BTN's range to TT-55 (all with 100% weight), the two programs agree that UTG has 51.85% equity. There seems to be a methodological difference in the application of weights to overlapping ranges.

The equity of AA-66 vs TT-88,[50.0000]77-55[/50.0000] on a 8c7d6s is 53.1%.
I have double-checked this with another program.
Any other value is simply incorrect.

Hi Scylla, in the saved-range field, may we have a tool to re-arrange the order of ranges? Currently it is fixed chronologically which is very rigid.

Can you please try drag+drop?
It should be possible to move them around with this.

Thank you Scylla. It worked.

I have this question and I need your advice.

Let's say I am considering the match-up between 22 and AK. The equity part is available, but I am interested in HOW 22 wins/draws/loses to AK. For example, 22 beats AK by being a full-house hand (containing 22) beating a top-pair hand (containing AK) for x% of the time, or by 1 pair (22) beating Ace high (AK) for y% of the time.

I know this is a complicated problem. If you have encountered this problem before, please guide me. Thank you very much.

We don't offer this specific feature, but I wil take it under consideration for future releases.

Hi Scylla, would you please add the back-door draws in the filter section? The solver rates combo BD draws highly, so it will be very useful.

For this, go to "Options" and turn ON "Also include 1 card backdoor flushdraws".



In Flopzilla v1, go to "Settings" and enable "Include 1 card backdoor flushdraws".

Sorry, I don't get it. Can you show how I can filter the percentage of JTs makes BD flush draw and BD straight draw?

In Flopzilla, a stat "Backdoor flushdraw" will be added to the available stats if the above mentioned option is applied.
Are you perhaps referring to GTO+?

BD straight is also a big deal, for both GTO+ and Flopzilla filters. Just think about it on the turn, BD flush gives you 10 helpful cards, BD straight gives you 8 or 12.

The suggestion indeed comes from GTO+ solutions, whereas it prioritizes these combo draws (i.e. BD flush+BD straight, GS straight+BD flush,...) when bluffing.

So I think we should have these kinds of detailed filters in Flopzilla, perhaps also in GTO+. "Another software" has them, I saw.

Ok, I will consider it for future releases.

Is there a way to separate the range so you can have some of your range as a call and some of it as a raise and then the other part of it as a fold using colors?

You can assign a weighted filter to a hand by right-clicking a stat to fix it, using weight bar to set a weight, and clicking on individual hands in the matrix.
It's however not possible to assign multiple groups to individual hands.
From a technical viewpoint this would not be particularly difficult, but it would be more difficult to use, and would go beyond the purposes of Flopzilla.
If you're interested in weighted ranges in decision trees, then it's probably better to use GTO software; for this we offer GTO+.

but I'm a tournament player and GTO + is for cash and sit n go's last I heard

Ok, I see your point.
I'll see if we can add the ability to select multiple groups for a single hand.

I was lookingin Flopzila Pro for Equity realization maps like in Equilab Pro but didnt find it.
Does Flopzilla Pro has it?

Equity realization is basically just EV; in fact EV is the perfect way to calculate realized equity.
For this, we offer GTO+, which will automatically figure out the exact playability of each hand, with no manual input being needed.

That being said, are you perhaps referring to hotness?
For this, switch to "Multiway" mode, enter two ranges, and select the "Hotness" output.

Thanks, I do have GTO+ but it requires setting up trees and long solving and I was looking for quick approximation fro realised equity and maybe Hotness will work

It's relatively easy and fast to acquire this data from GTO+, whereas it's very cumbersome and inaccurate to acquire from any equity based calculations. What's most important here, is the fact that equity based calculations are inaccurate for these purposes, whereas GTO calculations have pinpoint accuracy, with almost no effort being required.

It's not necessary to build an overly complex tree for this.
Both a basic tree and a complex tree will lead to nearly identical EV results.

To acquire this data from GTO+:
1) Enter range 1
2) Enter range 2
3) Enter the flop
4) Go to "Build tree", use the "Basic" tab and just build a standard tree, with the recommended number of bets
5) Run the solver
6) Go to the first decision
7) Click on the "Graph" button (below the table)
8) Plot EV versus equity

See the screenshot below.
For simplicity I have set up the starting pot as being 100.

For example, we can see that A3o has an equity of 51%, while its EV is only 35 (out of the pot of 100).
So in this spot A3o has reverse implied odds (it performs worse than you would expect based on its equity).
This can also be seen, because its dot in the graph is below the dotted blue line, which represents what the EV would have been, if purely based on checkdown equity.

Whereas a hand like Jc8c has an EV of 84, while its equity is only 54%, giving it implied odds.

No matter how much effort is done with an equity based calculator, it's not possible to manually obtain data with this level of accuracy.

Hello, will you make Flopzilla Pro resizeble window? as it was in Flopzilla