v2.83

http://www.stackandtile.com/forum/sh...d=6095#pid6095

http://www.stackandtile.com/sat/

just putting this other request here:

I'd like to not move the table at all, how can I do that?

Then why would you want to "ignore" it?

"Ignoring" a table removes it from SaT's detection of when action is required, and SaT relinquishes control. So an "ignored" table cannot continue to be in SaT's grid.

What exactly are you trying to accomplish? If you want to lock a table in the grid so that it doesn't return to the stack, you would use a "Keep table in grid" hotkey

I'd like to apply my idea using your software.
Basically what I've in my is to zoom the table under the mouse, then, if another table is selected, restore the table in the grid.
Your software locks the table into fixes sizes so I can't achieve what I want...

When you say you will 'zoom' the table, you mean resize it larger? Why can't you do that when the table is in the center of the screen? Then when you un-ignore SaT will snap it back to grid

I do remember someone showing a script doing something like this a few years ago in the free software forum, you'd need to search

While what you are saying make sense, imo it is too confusing...
Regarding the script it is very easy to do, and I did that, the real issue is S&T moving that table...
I'll try something else

any plans for mac?

No plans. You can use SaT by running Windows on your Mac either through dual booting with BootCamp or with virtualization such as Parallels or VMWare

+1 to this, came here to express the exact same request. An option to toggle focus stealing is very needed.

I will try to get this done for the next version!

I have an issue with ongame.
Basically if I have a table that is different from the table slot, it happens this



The mouse isn't responding, and I have to use ctrl+alt+del

see here, issue #4:
http://www.stackandtile.com/sat/help/ongame

but since i know what you're trying to do, i dont think thats gonna help

you can try using CTRL+SHIFT+ALT+Q instead
http://www.stackandtile.com/sat/help...-switch-hotkey

Sounds like this might help with Chico/ Tigergaming network

Has anyone who may have created a custom Chico network layout, care to share and secrets?

I'm having a problem with a custom site build for bovada. It seems like I can't fine the action button that works correctly since in MTTs there are situations where each button is missing. Any suggestions?

Yeah, suggestion is to use the built-in site. What is the reason why you're not doing that?

I had a couple slight mods to the site specifically for the buttons since they don't grab my attention when I'm not using Sat (playing 6 tables or less). I'll play around a little with the built in site (maybe take the mods off) and see what happens.

Thanks. I'll let ya know if I did anything cool.

You mean you just changed the button graphics/colors? That should be fine with the built-in site, as long as the button locations haven't moved

The built in site seems to work fine even with out changing the mods. (had some problems a while back which was why I was building the site). Thanks you!!! Thank you!!!

Is there a way/you have plans to let 2 instances of S&T communicate to each other?
Well you know what I'm trying to do, and turned out to be more difficult than I thought. Also I know some users are playing multisite so maybe this feature will help them.
Clearly if you play on a single site, S&T is clearly perfect, but if you are playing on different sites, the slot size could be troublesome, since every table has different layouts, fonts etc.
My idea was this: set up 2 instance of S&T, one for PS and one for other rooms ,so we have 2 different grids. When a table configurated on S&T instance 2 is activated, instead of snaps it onto the grid, I'd like to check whether a slot on S&T instance 1 is available, if it is, move that table there (without resizing).
I hope this is clear, but if it isn't I will elaborate again.

Kinda strange that this issue isn't bringed up a long time ago, I mean, playing multisite with S&T could be a trouble if some support isn't provided imo.
So maybe I just missing something, or this feature isn't just requested much.
Anyway do you jave some tips, playing multiple sites where windows size gotta be different because you can't see players names or stacks?

No plans

This would not work. you are forgetting that any time a table is under SaT's control and in its grid, it DOES get resized. So a table from the 2nd instance, snapping into the 1st instance's grid, would resize it to the slot sized of the 1st instance. In which case, there is no purpose of the 2nd instance at all.

There is no need to run a 2nd instance simply if you want to run 2 sites. That would be crazy. The only reason people do this is if they want separate stacks+grids for each site.

You are missing something. Multi-site play is already supported and has been from the start, and hundreds of customers are using it. Feel free to create a new layout, pick a reasonable slot size, and add as many sites as you want. There shouldn't be any problems with that.

Slot size is not troublesome across multiple sites. Many of the major sites allow their tables to be programmatically scaled and resized to whatever proportions I want. For those that sites that don't allow it (winamax) there is sometimes small overlaps, but overall the tables are still close in size.

And even then, the overlaps can sometimes be eliminated. See this page for explanation and a workaround:
http://www.stackandtile.com/sat/help...nt-table-sizes

If you are trying to use a slot size that is so tiny that only 1 pokersite supports that size, then that will definitely be a problem. And the solution is to use a slightly larger slot size that all your sites would fit into.

For your specific setup, you may need to seek another solution besides SaT to accomplish what you want. I thought there was an AHK script back in the day that demo'ed this, but i can't seem to find it. Although, I question whether or not this is a good use of your time at all. You've devoted a lot of time trying to hack together a solution for this that you could have spent simply grinding.

Remember that SaT's whole purpose is to make better use of your screen space and allow you to play more tables with less space. Perhaps instead of zooming, you could consider different 'move to grid' settings to keep tables in the stack longer, which saves screen space. For example, waiting until after you enter the pot to move the table, instead of when its your turn to act.

i have a problem with 888 tables sometimes. it's possibly similar to what 4-Star General is having with ongame. What happens is when I attempt to run stack and tile post an 888 game in progress I get a pulsating 888 table and I'm unable to hit any buttons or move my mouse for about 30 seconds. This causes all tables to timeout but eventually the 888 table sets into the grid and everything functions normal. This doesn't happen if Stackandtile has been started before the 888 table has been loaded so it's not a major issue.

However I have an 18 table grid, a 15 table grid, and a 10 table one and sometimes I enjoy to change my layout near the end of my sessions. If I attempt to change while an 888 table is already active I run into this issue. Any suggestions?

What version of SaT are you running? What version of Windows? Does it happen on tournaments or cash games? Can you easily reproduce it?

Great advice, really often I forget what is truly important, ty very much