tbh. Doug is of course one of the greatest players out there and has all of my respect
But ,with no disrespect, he is a bit outdated nowadays. He played Sauce Heads Up the other day (who is using solvers -PIO-) and he ended up admitting he felt out classed a bit and that he needs to study this "new strategies".
So I totally agree with vkartmann when he says:
Quote:
perfect frequencies (equilibrium) have higher impact on EV then having more bet sizes. (unless human is indeed super balanced)
also many betsizes is extremely complicated to balance correctly.(not sure what kind of an impact that would have)
and even if you get close the solver will be >=1% of the pot better anyway very often.
Clearly having a closer to GTO approach is better than multiple bet sizings. And nobody uses more than 4 different bet sizes per spot, too hard to balance, no one would know how to work that around imo.
Yeah you can still probably win more vs some opponents by exploiting some spots, but studying solvers will also give you a bigger understanding of when you can exploit imo.
GL