I'm not sure where you're getting "pressure" from. Contested means there was some betting and/or raising as opposed to just checking down. If I used the term pressure somewhere it would just mean that the opponent showed aggression.

You want to see when someone limped and then folded to a raise... By amount do you mean how big the raise was that they folded to? If so, you can do that with note caddy. If you mean you want to see how often they fold after limping, you can do that with Hem/Pt3 without note caddy.

I had a question for all you Sit and Go players using NoteCaddy. I was wondering what definitions are you using. I know there is a new definition out for the Push/Call Ranges when the Effective Blinds are getting big compared to your stack. Other than that, what other definitions are you guys using.

thanks for your time

This would come really handy since I play both NL and FL.

I'm thinking about a workaround. Could I create different definitions for NL and FL and copy them into the definitions folder as needed? I use a different databases for each game anyway, so for me it would be enough to get different definitions for different databases. Or is there an easier solution?

It would definitely be better if note caddy could differentiate between limit/NL/PL. I had a good idea of how to do that pretty easily but there are some urgent items that have priority now.

As far as your workaround, it would be a major hassle to move definitions around to do that. NC 1.10 beta has a feature where you can mass-disable definitions so you could name them like FL_3betslight... and then switch them around like that. 1.10 beta is not stable yet though so only people with strong stomachs are encouraged to even download it

http://forums.assaultware.com/showth...Now-with-Omaha

Major hassle = more than just copying a few files around?

But if some feature is already in the beta I might as well just wait

Will the beta also distinguish CAP hands from non-CAP hands?

new beta version: it would be nice if the seek replayer had a way to stop the seeking. It's very resource intensive (as a side note, the seek has crashed notecaddy various times due to it always maxing out CPU and often hanging the GUI; would be nice if this were moved in to a seperate low-priority thread), and it would be nice to stop it; right now the only way to stop it seems to be shutting the seek replayer.

Also it would be nice to have an option to jump to the first 'success'. I am testing some uncommon spots and doing a seek i get hundreds of 'opportunity' but the only way to see if it's actually working is to find a 'success' hand as well, which right now requires me to manually page through each hand until i find one.

Just to be very clear there is no imminent plan to distinguish different hand types (other than between omaha and holdem) although limit/NL will definitely happen ASAP. Beta 1.10 is not yet stable as-is but that will hopefully be resolved in the next day or two. As far as separating CAP, I have to see if HEM/PT3 do so in their databases before I can determine how difficult it would be in NC. I am also always wary of adding new options because NC is already too confusing as is.

There does need to be a stop button as well as some other improvements on the seek screen - no question about that. However, as far as the low priority thread, that would slow it down considerably and there are already people complaining about performance on my forums. If you select single threaded performance in settings, it will do just that actually but it will also do all other processing single threaded. As I mentioned above I am wary of adding too many options.

You may enjoy today's release hood:



http://forums.assaultware.com/showth...Now-with-Omaha

Also, make sure to try the Caddy Report which is new and hopefully a very useful screen for live session play

Looks great thanks! Will give it a spin.

New seek functions are working great! Beta is now feeling pretty stable, I just went through all my filters and redid them all without a crash, and the seek worked great.

Ok, this took me some time to figure out: A big bet on the turn in FL is considered to be a small bet, not a minbet as on the flop. It does make sense actually.

Would be nice if I could just grey out all the checkboxes for different betsizes which I don't need for a limit game.

I would also like an option to make the note icon in my HUD coloured if I have entered a note manually and just keep it grey if I haven't. With Notecaddy I actually forget to check my own notes quite often. Or does highlight HEM notes already do this? Haven't checked actually.

And maybe a save button on every page, because it's annoying to always go to File -> Save or use the keyboard. And I accidently overwrite my old note quite a lot.

To get rid of a definition completely, I have to manually delete it on my hard drive, right? Or have I just missed the option in Notecaddy?

Using the latest beta btw.

Ha yup that caught me up too. Minbet = a small bet in limit (preflop, flop), small bet = big bet in limit (turn, river).

I'm having some trouble with a simple-ish script, basically I want to use NC to find out how often preflop villain is 4 betting after hero 3 bets v the same villain's 2 bet.

The previous action bit seems ok, we specify 'action had to be performed by hero' and it's a 3 bet by him. But what action(s) should we specify for the Preflop Actions tab? I tried various options but then Note Caddy does not seem to get a correct count of the opportunites.

However if I write a similar script for how often vilain folds versus a hero 3 bet preflop, Note Caddy seems to count the opportunities correctly (ie it then matches the results i get when i filter via HM).

You might as well pick all bet sizes for almost all cases. Adding the bet sizing filter to NC was a major task but whenever people send me definitions they never use it lol

highlight hem notes only highlights the note when NC writes something there so it is doing the opposite of what you're looking for. You also lose your autorate icons so it's not for everyone. As far as the different color text, that's out of my hands for now since it's all managed by pt3/hem and my affiliation with these companies is not such that I could demand that from them

those pages are too busy as is. Just ctrl+s for now - it's like second nature to me but I am in visual studio 12-15 hours per day anywhere which is why the NC interface now copies it

You could try deleting the file but it may mysteriously come back due to how I made the installer. Soon the process is going to change somewhat and you'll be able to delete files safely. For now I recommend just right clicking and making inactive.

I think what you're looking for is the "open raise/4 bet" action. In fact I've created the definition you've described:

http://www.assaultware.com/4betshero3bet.xml

I just tried to use this but when I modify it at all I get the error message 'Input string was not in a correct format'

Hi Sreti

I've tested this and similar definitions and it seems that Note Caddy is not counting opportunities correctly in these 4b v hero 3b situations.

Specifically it seems that if villain folds v hero's 3 bet then Note Caddy does not count this a 4 bet opportunity (of course it is an opportunity).

For instance I checked this by filtering hands in HM where hero 3 bets a certain villain. According to HM, hero has 3 bet this villain 7 times against which this villain folds 4 times, calls the 3 bet once and 4 bets twice.

And using NOte Caddy definitions NC notes_export shows these results:

fold v hero 3 bet (4/7 57%) ... ie correct
call v hero 3 bet (1/3 33%) ... ie miscounting opportunities
4 bet v hero 3 bet (2/3 66%) ... ie miscounting opportunities

I'd be grateful if you could take a look at this. Thanks

I did a number of tests on this in version 1.10 beta, tagwag, and everything worked just fine for me.

Please email a note definition along with a hand that should be counted as an opportunity but is not to support@notecaddy.com so it can be investigated further.

Can you please add the Entraction network ? Just the hand history read ability would be fine and I'd buy it. At this moment it can't take notes for Entraction right ?

Entraction support is currently present. It's not listed in the OP because it's out of date. I am going to request an update of the OP pretty soon

OK thanks, I haven't seen it in the manual either so thought it was not there, needs to be updated too I guess

hey can somebody make some note definitoins for me?

i want: "folded to 3bet from BB when villain opened from SB with stack sizes LESS than 45BB" (i want the %)

also i want: flatted open raise IP w AA/KK stack size >20 bb (if this could be done vs TAG or whatever player type eve better)
ill ship a few bucks or so on ftp to whoever does it, assuming it works...im good for it ldo.

name a price and if its reasonable im down.

tyia

sreti feel free to do this for me if you like, ill pay you the same. name a price and if its legit im down.

I want to make these but I can't. The problem is I don't have 1.09 on any of my computers anymore and 1.10 beta definitions don't work with 1.09. Right now I'm not encouraging most people to get on 1.10 yet since it's still having some problems. By Sunday I imagine 1.10 will be good enough for me to recommend trying it. I'm thinking most hard core users (who could easily make these) are already on 1.10 but hopefully someone will help out sooner than sunday.

These things are done please look :

http://forums.assaultware.com/showth...=1775#post1775

If you like to donate contact me via PM in the assaultware forums, because on 2+2 I'm mostly a reader not a writer.

Greetings Coldskin

Having problems with the color coding in Note Caddy v1.09b

I've noticed 4 or 5 players (with out searching too hard so there will be more) which should have a color assigned, but have nothing. Have I got something wrong with my definitions or is there a know issue here?

Is it worth me upgrading to the new beta version?