If I'm reviewing an entire SNGMTT does ICMIZER automagically switch from cEV to $EV when I hit the final table?

1. What about ICmizer 3 ? It's already a very long time you guys keep announcing it as 'very very soon', yet no news still after many months, except the last time saying it will be more delayed...

2. Where did you hide the call range box for BB in HU in this version 2.16.3??

Thanks. 2.16.4 fixed the problem

I made this query many many months ago and got no free gift!

Another small idea that would be nice and probably trivial to implement: a way to manually adjust the pot size without adding any more players/action. It comes up often enough where, say, you have 3 or more prior VPIPs and/or allins, and therefore cannot get a calculation for hero range; in this case, I'd at least like to be able to eliminate players as needed to allow calculation while still having a way to add their chips to the pot. Would be great for those times when there are one or even multiple players who raise or call and then fold in a long series of actions. Sometimes there are only two or three players to calculate allin equity for at the end of it, but the folded players' prior actions can still disallow calculation just for being there. Sometimes their chips significantly inflate the pot so would be nice to be able to manually insert a pot size and just ignore their earlier actions.

Hi. If there are 100 or fewer players left in MTT, then calculations should be made in ICM mode with MTT Mode on.
Chip EV mode should only be used when ICM mode is not available.
For now, its situations with 100 or more players.
Check out this video to learn more:
https://www.icmpoker.com/en/video/mt...tegy-in-poker/

Hi.
We're getting great progress with ICMIZER 3.
However, I've set acceptance requirements very strict and we are still optimizing everything so we can be proud of the release. The nature of this work doesn't allow to give an ETA, but it will be soon. I am not going on any vacations before we have an ICMIZER 3 release

You're welcome. That was an unfortunate bug.

Hi ThePokerBot
Please don't be mad, but that particular question was really special for me.

Hi SageLee
Thanks for the suggestion. As always with suggestions, I can't give any promises.

Not sure if i did something wrong but in Nash FG6 i can shove over the raise with 23% of hands

But when i make the blinds go up next hand still with FG6 i can now only shove 17% of hands; i would have thought that the blinds going up next hand, even if they don't affect the stacks sizes too much nor being in early position would have a "positive" affect on the range we can shove i.i. we should be able to shove wider?

https://www.icmpoker.com/icmizer/#Dpnjbz

Also, a little nit-picky of me i know, but can you change the player name from "MP1" to "Lowjack" which is a more precise label

Hello, I have a question regarding MTT mode? When we select MTT mode ICIMIZER always generates the same static number of players/stack sizes. I am wondering how much effect does this have on accuracy vs if we actually had written down the number of remaining players and their stack sizes and input them manually?

Hi regarding Lowjack, this is first time I hear the name. Our target audience is global and this term is simply not common enough. Even Hijack is a stretch to be honest.

Regarding your example, its very questionable.
Combining Chip EV with FGS often doesn't change much.
Blinds growing next hand doesn't change much in our strategy here either.
The biggest jump that you see is probably explained by Beta calculation mode for situations with 1 raiser and difference between Calculate and Calculate Nash buttons, see this article:
https://icmizer.zendesk.com/hc/en-us...ter-Calculate-

Hi
For best results, our recommendation is to manually enter all the stacks, of course.
However, if you play around with generator function and check how different stacks affect our decision, you may notice
that the difference is not enough to justify this burdensome process of entering all stacks correctly.
Make sure that you check out this video if you're using this feature:
https://youtu.be/XBhi3gVkOrc
There I demonstrate how to use it correctly. It has slightly older visual looks of MTT control, but everything else is the same.

these are some random wishlist features that I would like to see added. I have no clue how complicated they are to implement. For the record I think ICMizer 2 is already a great product.

having folders for saved ranges. say “bb call range vs sb” and then I could have individual ranges, “10bb tight”, “10 bb loose”…

Changing all the stack sizes at the table to a certain value. Now, if I want to see my 15bb UTG range in a spot. I have to manually change all the stack sizes.

If you could see the ev of your entire range and how it changes when you alter your opponents ranges. Ev flow only applies to push fold spots were everybody is playing nash.

Sliders to alter the tables pushing and calling tendencies and have FGS take this into account. Having this for individual opponents.

if icmizer could take the effect of the big blind calling min raises(opening raises) into consideration. I’m assuming a bunch of -ev pushes(rejam from the big blind) would be +ev calls. I don’t think flatting (calling) from every position is necessary and I assume this would make calculations much slower. The initial raising ranges should be optimized vs the bb calling range and not vs rejaming ranges imo. Maybe this creates problems I haven’t considered.

If the user could input equity realization numbers for the calling range(or individual combos in the calling range).

if user’s could have a few calculations per month at higher FGS when 6-9 handed. These tend to be high $ev spots. Maybe a quo could be used or restrict this to particular times in the day. I know that some of the gto solver sites have libraries of precalculated solutions, which are browsable.

Will ICMIZER 3 cost more than 2, and if so how much?

Thanks. Are there any downsides to using FGS all of the time? I've read the article (below) and understand it was designed primarily for short-handed small stack situations where the approaching BB will wreck your equity. But if I have it on all the time will it ever give me a bad result?

https://www.icmpoker.com/en/blog/how...culator-works/

Hi. Thank you for the suggestions.
I can say that with ICMIZER 3 we will be adding some powerful quality of life changes which hopefully will improve the user experience even more.
However as usual I can't promise or comment on anything much.
My goal is to keep ICMIZER nice and clean, and that each feature it offers is widely adopted by a large percentage of users.

HI Lupin III
ICMIZER 3 will be more expensive than ICMIZER 2 because it will offer a lot of new features and functionality.
Prices will be announced closer to the actual release date which still isn't publicly announced.

Existing users of ICMIZER 2 with active subscriptions will be able to perform a pro-rated upgrade to ICMIZER 3 subscription by paying the difference for the remaining subscription period, which makes the transition very fair and comfortable for our existing subscribers.

Hi
This is a complex question with no easy answer.
Generally, I do not see big issues with the FGS-always approach, however, this doesn't mean that there are no cases where ICM based results might be better suited for a particular tournament situation. Both ICM and FGS of varying depth have their powers and limitations and there is no clear evidence that FGS is guaranteed to be always better.

I deleted my icon by accident how do i get it back lol

Hey Q, seems like all your servers are down mate. Thanks

Down for me too.

I can recommend uninstalling and then reinstalling ICMIZER.

Hi.
We had an accident on our server earlier yesterday which lasted approximately two hours.
We've resolved the issue asap.
Sorry for the interruption, we will ensure something like this is unlikely to happen again.