Hi Q
I found an non mathematical error relative to calculate nash button. It says "equilibruim".
Thanks for ur previous answer.

Hah, nice catch.
I will fix that lol. Noone noticed it for a while I guess!

Hi Q

Is there anyplace to buy an icmizer shower curtain? Something like chemical element´s table in The Big Bang Theory, but with some calculation charts.

Well this is ICMIZER support thread, and what your asking is outside the scope of the thread.

In general fixed charts are pretty useless, especially ones, which you can easily buy or even get fo free. You should be adapting to opponents at your tables, and that means no chart will ever match situation at your table and provide you with a correct range.

I wouldn't recommend seeking a shortcut here, you need to spend time studying ICM. Substituting that with a table can be a marketing move by creator of charts, but that wont get you far in terms of skill.

Maybe i didnt explain myself very well, i was asking for merchandising products, like this shower curtain.
http://bunnysmith.comyr.com/wp-conte...urtain.jpg.jpg
Greetings.

Hmm link doesn't work but I think I understand what you are talking about.
No, I don't think thats possible anywhere or planned. Curious thought though =)

How do I access the software? Once I paid for the subscription, I didn't receive a password and when I click on the subscription tab, I'm not able to enter my product key into the box for product key. The cursor does not allow me into that box to type any characters at all.

First you need to create an account, and then bind the purchased key to this account.

Please complete simple account creation procedure here:

http://www.pokericmcalculator.com/signup/

Afterwards get back to Subscription page in ICMIZER and enter the key here:

http://www.pokericmcalculator.com/icmizer/#subscription

Hope it helps

When I make a standard scenario with 1000/2000 blinds and 200 ante, why won't it allow a min raise? It says minimum raise is 2200. Is it just including the ante into the raise size?

Yes, antes are included in all bets. So minraise of 2000 chips in this case would mean 1800 raise, and 200 ante, which is impossible.

Are there any plans to add "EQPre EQPost E EQDiff" like on holdemresources so we can see how profitable is a push/fold strategy ?

Can you estimate when future game simulation will be available?

EQPre are available already(hit ICM calculator button).

I guess its more about EQDiff and EQPost, those will be available either along with FGS or shortly afterwards. They are part of FGS algorithm so clearly they will be available.

I've been pretty bad with estimating FGS arrival, but its something I am working right now. It will be the next major feature update.

So as soon as its done I guess, like Blizzard usually says about their games.

Hi Q
The system was updated today, any details about changes?

Thats just a minor update (last number), it was internal (nothing new added) just some bugfixes of rare bugs.

I'm usually announcing everything interesting, but it usually happens when second number increases. (v1.5.3 =>v.1.6.0 for example).

Update: Added support for Winamax poker format today.

It actually includes 2 formats, direct Winamax txt format and Winamax hands coming from PT4.

Has the revolution network been added yet to supported sites?

It says that pokertracker is supported, so I got the free trial with 3 calculations supported. So I try to load a HH from pokertracker. And it shows the HH and then i click "load them" and nothing shows up.

Hey, I got a question. Does ICMizer consider blockers, when calculating my pushing ranges?

SpadeRunners, hey sure. You can hit [Detailed result] button below usual result grid to see calculation details. But the short answer is yes, everything is taken into account. Hero hand affects other probabilities that opponents get dealt certain ranges. And opponent ranges affect chances of other opponents too etc. ICMIZER is the most precise icm poker calculator in this regard.

lotuselise88, no, revolution network was not added. Do they even pay out this days? PT4 Format is mostly supported for provided list of supported poker rooms, because sometimes its slightly different from hands coming directly from poker rooms.

If you have problem with revolution hand coming from PT4 then thats expected behaviour. If its a hand from supported room, shoot me a support request via email with a hand text.

Yes they pay out in a couple days if you are on the right skin. (ie. Intertops, Pure, Juicy)
It's a Revolution hand coming from PT4. I'm 100% down to buy IMCIZER once it's supported so just let me know if you add it.

Thanks!

Hey, been using ICMIZER through the web. Now it wont load? Im using a mac. I have the latest Microsoft silverlight so it should load. Anyway i can get it downloaded so i don't have to use it via the web.

Thanks.

Hey Luke.

Thats curious. Could you contact me via support email (support(at)pokericmcalculator.com) and send details about this problem with a screenshot.

Generally I believe everything is working cause other Mac users aren't reporting this issue, so I would like to help you.

Thanks,
Q

I'd like to buy a subscription to ICMizer. However I don't have a creditcard (which is also need if one uses the Paypal option). Is there any other possibility to pay?

I wrote a private message to you.

Hey Q,

If i'm trying to model bubble factor for MTTs with a large number of players in them, based on my options available within ICMIZER for maximum number of players and number of payouts.

For example say Hero is an MTT in which 100 get paid and we currently have 200 players remaining. We need to lose 50% of the field before we are ITM. The differences in payouts aside if i models this as a 180 man with 27 paid and 54 remaining players would that be roughly the same? And the same as 7 players paid with 14 remaining (so i can now use Nash)?

The reason i ask is because as you have said in your videos bubble factor is never less than one. So if i was to use a cEV example say CO shoves 15bbs with Nash which is 30% and Hero calls 21% (holding say A8o) even with 50% of the field needing to go bust until the money (so a long way until the bubble) at $EV A8o loses 0.45%, so even so far away from the bubble this +cEV play is a -$EV play?