Sorry that it took me so long, I completely forgot about my promise.

It appears to me Ad-Block (it gets censored without hyphen) disables purchase buttons. Hope that helps and you can figure out how to change it so that other surprised users won't experience it.

Oh, thanks for letting me know.
Sure can help me to investigate this further. So for you it works without *******?
Cause for me it works with ******* in chrome too.

Correct

Well new ICM calculator is ready at last, can be found here: http://www.pokericmcalculator.com/icmcalculator/

Let me know if its best in town

got the error message

unable to parse provided text as valid poker hand

hand where somebody was autoallin

i dont report it this time. i reported a bug where not all players got a starting hand 24 days ago, and still not fixed.

Could you resend me this bug report? I don't think I have received this one.
And yeah I dont fix bugs in 24 hours.. Your tone assumes I should though?

Sorry to dissapoint but in a project this big it takes some time, and depending on bug it can be a long time.

Some types of auto allin hands are not supported currently. Those are very rare though.

i did send it on 22 july. it is case 1089.
(Offen) new seated players got no cards, hh load does not work

Thank you for your message.
I have received it and will get back to you as soon as possible.
You can check the status of your message at the following URL:


ofc i dont expect a fix within 24h hours. but in max 2 weeks. so i was surprised after 3.5 weeks.

if it takes over a month idk if it makes sense to report bc such spots are rare and i am faster to plug those rare spots in manually

i send it again + the bug today

Yep got both issues now, and replied to you in email.

I will add support for multiple moved players from other tables, but it will have a pretty low priority, and countdown starts from today, cause that email from 22 july got missed somehow (I reworked support system a little since then so even fewer emails get chance to be missed now).

Thanks for feedback.

Hi.

First, an observation: This happened to me at first, too. It was because I wasn't logged in, which meant that I couldn't click anything. I ignored the link given in the email once you purchase a subscription, and instead put the code straight into the software, which solved this problem.

@Q: Thanks for your reply to my question the other day. Since then I've purchased a 12 month subscription and am happy so far.

I have 2 questions:

1 I notice it's possible to run ICMIZER while my poker client is running, which would allow one to use it during play to guide decisions. (I realise that this would be difficult as you'd have to manually enter all the hand info, but still, it's possible). I think (though I'm not certain) that doing this would contravene the TOS of most sites. Have you ever thought about blocking ICMIZER-use when a poker client is running? Pokertracker 4's ICM calculator, though vastly inferior imo to ICMIZER, says "ICM features are disabled due to possible site TOS violation. Please close all poker sites and try again" if you try and run it while you're logged in to a poker client. Would you be willing to implement such a feature into ICMIZER, to stop shady players from getting an advantage?

2 In this hand http://www.pokericmcalculator.com/icmizer/#Cenb, some players are limited to push/fold decisions, but the SB and BB almost certainly will not either push or fold, as they aren't sufficeintly short-stacked to make this their only play. If one them does raise PF, it probably won't be all in. Bearing this in mind, what pushing range should I enter for the SB in the above hand? Perhaps just AA? The above hand is just one of many examples where 1 or more players isn't short-stacked enough to just be pushing/folding - how can I deal with these less black and white spots?

Thanks for your time.

P.S. Your English is very good. You probably know this. But... I speak a foreign language myself and am glad to be corrected, as it helps me improve, so I hope this helps... I've watched some of your youtube videos and sometimes you miss out the word "the" before nouns. E.g. in a recent post you said - it should say "the new calculator...". Maybe this was just a typo. Anyway no offence intended, I hope this helps.

Hey N__M I think my English is reasonable, however its nowhere near as good as I would like it to be. Missing the near nouns is my specialty I guess. You are correct thats a mistake and I should double check my posts.

The fix of purchase buttons is my priority now lol cause it can lead to a missed customer very easily.

About your questions

1. Afaik PS and FTP do not allow running ICMIZER in parallel with their software. However ICMIZER is based on Silverlight plugin technology which runs all programs in secure safebox. So ICMIZER cannot access harddrive (unless its user initiated open file request like multiple hands loader). It can't even dream of accessing process list so currently thats not possible technically to implement.

2. I think you are pretty wrong that SB and BB won't be pushing in this hand. They arent too deep, and if SB raises, BB can reshove very wide, and SB would have to fold. Keeping that in mind you see that Nash shove for SB is pretty wide still. You can just edit shoving range here to reasonable value based on your understanding of situation.

You dont have to be super precise with estimation, cause SB vs BB has limited effect on your shoving range in this spot (its only a part of Fold EV calculation).

Thanks for your reply.

Your English is much better than just reasonable. You seldom ever make mistakes. I can tell you're Russian on the youtube vids by your accent , but accents are v. v. hard to get rid of I guess.

re. 1: That's reassuring to know. However, isn't it still possible for someone to manually enter stack size, hand, etc. into ICMIZER and then calculate whether to push/fold? I've read this entire thread and a one or two people asked about doing the calculations while they were playing, which is a bit worrying because I'd have thought that at least some players have actually done so.

Imo, something like PT4's diabling feature I mentioned earlier would be a welcome addition to prevent players gaining an unfair advantage. I suppose they could still use other online ICM calculators, but still...

re. 2: OK, maybe the linked hand wasn't the best example. Imagine instead the SB and BB both have 50BBs and all other players have ~10BBs. In this case the 50BB stacks surely wouldn't push. Bearing this in mind, what ought I, as a 10BB stack, to input into the 50BB stack's pushing range? Would only AA be the best bet? This is one narrow question concerning the broader issue how ICMIZER deals with a table where some players are restricted to push/fold, but others are not.

Quick review after purchase: To anyone reading this - or to Q if you have a testimonial section on ICMIZER's website - I second the positive reviews of ICMIZER in this thread. For any serious SNG player it is an absolute must. No other ICM calculator I know of comes close to ICMIZER. Extraordinarily user-friendly, astonishingly powerful; every SNG-player should own it. Customer service so far has been excellent too.

lol? aren't the games hard enough for you?

and tell me 1 serious multitable regular who does plug in everything in short time for cheating.
maybe there is 1 occasional cheater, but those guys are mostly no threat anyway.

Hello,

I cant see the chart anymore here , (boton ..) http://i.imgur.com/Bexcmru.png i click and nothing happen..

And there is a bug in my downloaded version, after 2 hands i cant assign nash range anymore,

I am forced to use browser version now!

Thank you!

rhalala, about Charts, when I hover over CA range I cant build chart is that the problem right? In other spots charts are working I think. I'll fix this.

About Assign nash bug, which you experience, please elaborate more, exactly what happens? With a screenshot pls. Generally downloaded version isn't different from online version, so switching to browser version isn't supposed to change anything.

This is fixed update v1.4.4

I also added ability to rotate stacks clockwise and counterclockwise. So if you click rotate clockwise button , BB stack will move to UTG, SB to BB, BTN to SB etc.

This has been requested over last year, and I believe it can have its uses.

Hi,

I need some help. I calculated the 3 bet pushing range for a heads up situation and got a table with all hands, in which the pushing hands are green. My question now is, is EV compared to folding or to zero EV?

This topic can lead to a lot of headache so I recommend you to stick to short answer:
just use ICMIZER +EV range (green).

Long answer can be found here: http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/18...tting-1243256/

I go in detail about this question there but I warned you.

i though i update before to 1.4.4 , today(dont know why) it ask me update, so i will see if problem still! thank you!

is it possible to analyze CAP tables in icmizer? im trying atm and have no clue how to do that

Hey HateMonday,
If I understand your question correctly, yes you can.

Create 5/10 blind structure, and represent each stack as BBx10, so if someone has 25BB stack, you put him as 250 chips.

Or if you are playing higher stakes, for example 1/2$ cap you can represent stacks in dollars and create 1$/2$ blind structre for this.

ICMIZER does'nt support blinds with decimal point, so you would need to multiply blinds and stacks by 10 if your bbs got decimal point (0.5/1$ for example).

Also set Output to ChipEV for this kind of analysis.

Hope it helps.

Is there a way to imput default calling and over calling ranges when running customs push/fold escenarios with ICMizer? Working on diferent scenarios and having to set up each and every villains calling/over calling ranges left to act manually waist lots of time, i know its an awesome feature to have, but when running default scenarios i would like to set up a default callign/over calling ranges for the people behind me? Cheers.

And also whats happening with your email (tenbbcom@mail.com)? Everytime i want to send you guys an email get this...

Hey Potamito,

This question sounds like something I heard before, in that case player didn't realize there is Calculate nash equilibrium feature. You don't need default ranges (cause they are useless), just hit calculte nash equilibrium first, and then go from there.

Regarding email, its @gmail.com, not @mail.com

Man youre doing a great job with this software.

Hey
Can you remove the limits?

Account: MechEn

Thanks in advance