ICM HoldemResources Calculator [HRC] - Page 38 - Poker Software -- Two Plus Two Poker Forums

Do you get an error message or some actual crash? In the case of a crash, check that your firewall actually allows HRC to connect to the database port.

Quote

06-15-2021 , 05:05 AM

#928

Oat Nairn

journeyman

Join Date: Mar 2011 Posts: 290

Just a crash, tried again this evening and it randomly works again.

Thanks for the quick responses

Quote

06-15-2021 , 06:04 AM

#929

plexiq

veteran

Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 2,554

Quote:

Originally Posted by buffyslayer1

Any update on the save feature?

Thanks

Save/load for Monte Carlo mode is online now.

Quote

06-18-2021 , 09:06 AM

#930

vulcaum

enthusiast

Join Date: Jan 2012 Posts: 61

Hi i cant open HRC, i dont know why it was working fine then i tried to update it and it stop opening when i hit the icon nothing happens... i've already try to reboot, re install and made the troubleshooting that i found in your site... Can someone help me pls?

Quote

06-18-2021 , 05:00 PM

#931

queroaprender

enthusiast

Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 59

Hello there!

I was calculating a spot with a bubble factor. There were 245 players remaning and the ITM starts at 243. Only 2 players to go

The EV was shown below in the picture

It says that jaming the AQo gives a +$5.89

But if I fold I can almost guarantee the ITM prize, around $12

So I would like to understand if the shove is good or not

In other words, the shove by itself gives +$5.89 but does it count the times were we get called and got busted?

Thanks a lot!!!!

Quote

06-18-2021 , 05:45 PM

#932

plexiq

veteran

Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 2,554

Of course, it considers the times you get called and you bust or double up. Just make sure you enter prizes and the stacks from other tables correctly, the calculation will handle the rest

Last edited by plexiq; 06-18-2021 at 05:51 PM.

Quote

06-24-2021 , 03:24 PM

#933

queroaprender

enthusiast

Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 59

Quote:

Originally Posted by plexiq

make sure you enter the stacks from other tables correctly

There are around 25 tables left, it is impossible to input this info.

Anyway, supposing that we are almost 100% guaranteed to be ITM if we fold, and it gives about +$12, does we have to consider this amount when comparing the EV of the play?

Because jaming gives me +$5.89 so I prefer fold to get ITM

Thanks a lot

Quote

06-24-2021 , 03:28 PM

#934

queroaprender

enthusiast

Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 59

I'm using the Beta version and I would like to compare the EV do calling a 3bet or 4bet shove

I made this betting setup

It gave me this result

So lets pick the AJo as example

Calling has 2.59bb EV and it is played 0%

Jaming has 0.97bb EV and is played always

Why is that?

Also, if I click "Best response" on the CALL line, it changes all the range to call and 0% shove

How to interpret the results?

Thanks a lot!

Quote

06-24-2021 , 03:31 PM

#935

plexiq

veteran

Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 2,554

About the MTT hand: By entering it correctly I meant making sure that the # of remaining players and avg/total chips were correct.

Calling is 5.89$ better than folding, so folding is quite a blunder if the ranges are accurate.

Regarding the other calc: Run more Nash iterations (green button) if the highest EV option isn't played 100%.

Last edited by plexiq; 06-24-2021 at 03:36 PM.

Quote

06-24-2021 , 08:35 PM

#936

zekura

stranger

Join Date: May 2021 Posts: 10

Plexiq, i've been running monte carlo sims in HRC BETA (advanced) with 1000m samples just to be sure that the results are accurate. Do you recommend to lower the samplesize to for ex 500m and still get the "same" results, or would this give us wayoff results?

Quote

06-28-2021 , 09:17 AM

#937

CorrectSide

grinder

Join Date: Jan 2017 Posts: 441

Hello,
is bubble factor table showing correct results when running Multi Table ICM sims? I am getting weird results.

Quote

06-28-2021 , 09:21 AM

#938

plexiq

veteran

Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 2,554

It should work fine with MTT, but feel free to send me the hand setup and I'll check it for you.

Quote

06-28-2021 , 09:25 AM

#939

plexiq

veteran

Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 2,554

Quote:

Originally Posted by zekura

The # of iterations required depends on the size of the game tree, among other factors. So it really depends. A 10mb tree will probably be more than fine with 1000m iterations, a 10gb tree will require way more than that.

We have a convergence indicator planned, to give users a better idea about the state of the calculation. No ETA yet though.

Quote

06-29-2021 , 10:53 AM

#940

clapclap

journeyman

Join Date: Feb 2016 Posts: 342

Hey!

with this setup https://gyazo.com/71f26737313da78bd6c1b7da18350899

i get this error

https://gyazo.com/84b0487505dad430d1dd8026a6c50acd

any idea whats going on here?

Quote

06-29-2021 , 10:58 AM

#941

plexiq

veteran

Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 2,554

Did you select more than 3 players for the Monte Carlo player limit?

In the current version the size estimation always runs with max 3 active players, regardless of the actual setting used for the real calculation. This means it will under-estimate the tree size for calculations with an active player limit >3. We already have this patched and the fix will be included in the next update.

In the meantime you can try removing the secondary Postflop sizing and/or some of the 3 way options. Or use max 3 player for the MC limit.

Quote

06-29-2021 , 04:26 PM

#942

lipe piv

stranger

Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 14

Quote:

Originally Posted by queroaprender

Hey, I think the EV for jamming is in comparison to the EV of folding, which already calculates the chances of you being ITM. So if the EV of folding were to be 12$, it means that jamming AQo would give you around 17.89$.

Quote

07-07-2021 , 05:57 AM

#943

loxozavr123

stranger

Join Date: Mar 2020 Posts: 6

Hello. For 9 max knokout, will the push-fold calculation be more accurate in Monte carlo than in basic for all positions?

Quote

07-07-2021 , 11:30 AM

#944

plexiq

veteran

Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 2,554

Quote:

Originally Posted by loxozavr123

Hello. For 9 max knokout, will the push-fold calculation be more accurate in Monte carlo than in basic for all positions?

In general Monte Carlo is more accurate because it accounts for folded card removal effects (and optionally allows 4+-way pots).

The important thing about Monte Carlo mode is to make sure to run sufficiently large samples.

Quote

07-11-2021 , 04:01 AM

#945

OhSoLucky

stranger

Join Date: Sep 2020 Posts: 9

Hi,

I'm using HM3 and when been watching your tutorial on youtube how to import hands.

But when I import a MTT from the "hand history files" It doesnt show any hands.

What am I doing wrong?

Quote

07-11-2021 , 04:16 AM

#946

OhSoLucky

stranger

Join Date: Sep 2020 Posts: 9

Allso when i use "copy to clipboard" in HM3 and then try to import the hand manually i get a error in HRC saying "No valid hand-history found in the clipboard....."

Quote

07-11-2021 , 06:34 AM

#947

plexiq

veteran

Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 2,554

Make sure you copy the original format ("copy raw"). If you still have troubles then please send us a few HH examples to support@holdemresources.net and we'll look into it.

Quote

07-11-2021 , 08:27 AM

#948

OhSoLucky

stranger

Join Date: Sep 2020 Posts: 9

Quote:

Originally Posted by plexiq

Make sure you copy the original format ("copy raw"). If you still have troubles then please send us a few HH examples to support@holdemresources.net and we'll look into it.

Thanks ill try this, but what u mean is using original text, right?

And can you also answer the first question I posted? Thanks