Quote:
PokerAce/APerfect10,
Only one person has ever been disparaging about the competition, and that's you. Some quotes:
PokerAce: "There are problems with Holdem Manager that I won't get into that lead me to believe it won't be the next PokerTracker"
"I imported 10,000 hands more than Holdem Manager. Pretty big difference actually."
APerfect10: "PT3 makes this a non-decision" (Unsolicited, in a thread about Poker Sharpener).
"I assume you want a product that will still be around in 2008" (same thread).
PokerAce also spammed a BBV thread (a moderator even had to tell you to stop spamming), unfairly comparing your product with HM. In case APerfect10 doesn't realize, this was Roy's answer to those unfair comparisons. This is the first time he's said anything about PT3.
Quote:
Now, I realize this looks a little different than the HM graph. That's because PT3 imported 1,565,869 hands and the HM screenshot only shows 1,555,729 hands. That's an additional 10,140 hands in PT3. Pretty big difference actually.
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showthreaded.php?Cat=0&Number=12520984&pag e=6&vc=1
Quote:
I was replying because someone said the HM graph was ugly. I was offering to show a graph that wasn't so "ugly".
Roy has been honorable about this whole thing, and respectful of 2+2, never spamming or saying a bad word about anyone, even though there's plenty of bad stuff to say about PokerTracker.
I honestly don't get your attitude. The only reason HM exists is because PokerTracker Pat, sitting on a million+ dollars from his customers, didn't put a cent back into his product, didn't add any of the long requested features which he easily could have, and didn't innovate for years. If anything, you guys should be pleading for your customers to forgive you for treating them like crap. Because apart from everyday customer service (which you're very good at), you've treated your customers very badly when it comes to fixing basic product deficits, innovating, and doing timely upgrades.
If you're going to post one comment, post everything relevant so people get the whole picture. You quoted one post, I'll quote the other, which I made after people misinterpreted my original post:
Quote:
I was not doubting your skills as a developer or a designer. These aren't technical issues I was referring to. I have no desire to bash you or your product. It looks very well put together. I was simply responding to the idea that your software will make PokerTracker and PokerAce Hud "obsolete". I do not believe that is the case.
That was in response to this post:
Quote:
Um.... your posting this because Hold Em Manager is coming out soon and will make PokerTracker and your product obsolete. Please don't post under the guise of wanting to satisfy your customers; it's a little late for that. This is actually meant for PT and not PAHUD since I have never had a problem with your software or customer service. It just sucks that your product will be attached to PT.
A 10k hand difference is a big deal when talking about someone's results. In this instance, it was a $10k difference. I don't see how that comment is disparaging. I'm also not sure what you mean by unfairly comparing.
The whole "ugly" thing wasn't said by me. I quoted "ugly" because it's someone else's words, not mine (that's generally what quotes are used for). I offered to post a different looking graph is all and I got slammed for it.
Here's my first post in that thread:
Quote:
If someone gets me the hand histories, I can import them into PokerTracker 3 and give you a nice looking graph.
Nothing said about HM in that comment.
Phil, here's your response to
other people wanting a PT3 graph:
Quote:
What's that going to do? It's just a total graph...HM has already taken care of it after PokerTracker died.
PokerAce is just peddling his product, nothing more...he doesn't like it that Holdem Manager is showing them up.
Actually, now that I go back and read my posts, I don't feel they were "spammy." I was responding to negative posts directed to me. I feel the moderator jumped the gun a bit, but that's his perogative as a moderator. Another poster chimed in thinking my responses were fine.
As for Pat "not putting a cent" back into his product, you have no idea what you are talking about. You have no idea how much time answering HUNDREDS OF QUESTIONS
PER DAY takes. In addition to all that support Pat was doing, he has gone through a lot in his personal life the past few years. Things that took up so much of his time that I have no idea how he managed to keep up with support issues as it was. As for hiring new help, well, that's not as easy as you think. For one, the job wouldn't be "secure" in the traditional sense. People who would be qualified to do the work either wouldn't want to do it (they'd make more money playing poker), or they wouldn't want to risk getting into a volatile industry.
Phil, for someone who claims not to have any sort of personal interest in HM, you sure do go out of your way to make negative comments towards PT3. You were the first to say something negative in the FGators thread, which this whole discussion is based on.
This thread is about Holdem Manager. I suggest everyone gets back on topic. If you have problems with me or APerfect10, please either send it via PM or if you insist on making it public, put it in our thread.