This is not available yet, but it should be added in one of the next updates. With GTO+'s "Play against the solution" having mostly been finished, and FlopzillaPro having mostly been finished, we decided to first release a beta for both products. Some of the remaining details that haven't been taken care of yet will be added in the near future.

Hey Scylla
Why Floppzila Pro don't have the option to restore hand from the last time FZ was used or from the list of backups? It surprised me in a bad way

I don't think we've had this request before, but I will take it into consideration for later releases.

Thank you for the feedback,

Scylla

Hi Scylla,
Anyway to import all predefined ranges into CREV? Perhaps, this will be available in a future update and I just need to be more patient. I really enjoyed that feature in FZ 1.
Thanks!
P.S. Loving vs. 2.0

It's possible to import from Flopzilla v1 to CREV. For this, copy the newdefs2.txt file from Flopzilla v1 to CREV. We have however not included a method for exporting FlopzillaPro ranges to CREV. For this we are more focussed on GTO+, which has been designed to communicate with FlopzillaPro. We can consider also adding an export method for CREV, but at the moment this is not available.

Night mode would be great in the future. Is there a discount code if you get both Flopzilla and GTO 2.0? Many thanks!

The newly released v201 has the ability to feature a black background.
For this, under "Options", set "Night mode" to 100%.
See the screenshot below.
V201 can be downloaded here: www.flopzilla.com/flopzillapro.html.
In regards to your other question, there are no discount codes available.

Have you made any decisions about Flopzilla for short deck?

It's unfortunately not possible for me to discuss development plans.

Cheers mate!

Hello scylla,



When this is the case, I'm unable to paste the range into flopzilla. Do you know a solution?

Your screenshot says that it's possible to copy the range to the clipboard.
Would it be possible for you to mail this range to support?
Or is the issue that it's not possible to copy the range to the clipboard?

Hi folks,

Is there a way of clearing/resetting the groups when your building different grouped ranges? It seems that the last ranges grouping remains defaulted, however I swear I managed to reset it somehow. Cheers!

Loading any ungrouped range from the predef menu should reset it.
Or using the slider.
I will also make a change for v125 so that "Clear" resets it as well.

Nice one mate, cheers

Where can I find info about what is new in Flopzilla Pro? Thanks

For a manual and demonstration video go here: www.flopzilla.com/flopzillapro.html

I am missing Inverted mode in the flopzillaPro
https://prnt.sc/prhx2a < this thing , is it gone ?

Also imported ranges from predef file its done import but in reality doesnt show up in the new flopzillapro for me.

so for now i better use old version of flopzilla before these things are fixed

With "Play against the solution" for GTO+ having been finished, we decided to first release a beta for both products.
Some of the remaining features will be added in upcoming releases.


The import should work. Your ranges for Flopzilla v1 are stored in the file newdefs2.txt. This file can be found in Flopzilla's installation directory (most likely C:/program files (x86)/Flopzilla/Flopzilla). Place this file in the directory for FlopzillaPro (most likely C:\Program Files (x86)\FlopzillaPro\FlopzillaPro). Now, start FlopzillaPro, go to "Settings->Import ranges" in its menu, select "newdefs2.txt" and click on "IMPORT RANGES".

If you're having any issues, then please send your newdefs2.txt file to support.

Hi.

I think that old equity matrix was more convenient. You used to see equity of hands in both ranges at the same time. And now you have to switch ranges. Would be better I think to see both equity matrix simultaneously.
Same with “groups”.
I also prefer to see the two ranges I analyze each in separate window, so that I can add starting hands here and there fast (now I have to switch ranges, and if they are similar enough I have more chance to confuse).

So for me at this point FZv1 is more convenient.
Though thx for your job! FZ is one of the most useful software!

Ok, thank you for the feedback.
I will take it into consideration for future development.

Can't find GTO+ page, presume here is fine? Please forgive the wall of text.

I'm doing a database analysis. SB vs BB 40bb eff for MTT. I've got PF ranges from Modern Poker theory, I'm comparing/contrasting these ranges with a course I'm on to see if there's an EV difference between the two strategies. I'm going to do the same database of 55 flops(is this enough?) and compare the performance of:

- MPT SB vs MPT BTN 40bb eff
- Course ranges SB vs Course BTN 40bb eff
- MPT SB vs Course BTN range 40bb eff
- Course SB vs MPT BTN range 40 bb eff


I've setup a tree 33,55,77 for OOP betting, what are the benefits of adding the (d) for donking? I'm interested in whether or not GTO+ wants to donk, and what sizing it would like to use OTF and OTT. Also interested in the database as a whole to see how the ranges interact over various flop textures. My other settings are the same on for all positions and streets (33,55,77, 3x raise). I mainly did this as I have no idea what I'm doing tbh. I'd like to include overbetting. Anyone got ideas on why/when the solver would like to do this? Is it possible to let the solver play unrestricted and do what it wants to do in this spot? Presumably some spots it wants an overbet strategy, others not...... Should I always have this as an option?

By using 33,55,77 OTF OOP, do I force the solver to do something less optimal? What are the reasons for the (d), (p) (c)? What do they bring to the analysis that my vanilla setup doesn't?

Many thanks for any pointers, and thanks for adding the database function. Really intuitive to use for a computer rookie like me!

I love all the new filtering and range slicing you can do in Flopzilla Pro.

But can you filter for things like top pair top kicker, or something like bottom set?

I'm creating groups and using the pie chart function and the difference between top pair when it's AK and top pair when it's A5 is something I'd like to be able to divide up in different groups.

The thread can be found here: https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/1...nersev-155966/


As it actually turns out, in GTO, bet sizing is almost completely irrelevant. In GTO, for the solution for any bet size, a solution will exist for a different bet size that has almost the exact same performance. All bet sizes perform very closely to each other (typically within 1%). You can check this for yourself by creating the same tree, but for different bet sizes. After that, solve the trees and compare their overall EV. This EV can be found below the table in the very first decision for OOP. See the screenshot below. As you will notice, this EV will barely change, regardless of which bet sizes you use; even very large or very small ones. So GTO solutions don't really prefer any bet size, and the approach of using multiple sizes to see which one is preferred doesn't really work.



All bet sizings will have nearly the same performance. As a result, when using multiple bet sizes to see which sizes performs best, you're mostly just looking at static. If you make even a slight change to the ranges or tree then the frequencies may already shift to a different configuration.

For this, right-click a statistic to fix it.
You can now select individual hands within the statistic.
It's also possible to assign different coloured filters to different hands.