Hi Scylla
Apologies if you have answered this question elsewhere: What can I do to increase the solving speed of a flop database? What options can I change? If I am to buy a new computer, what specs should I aim for?
Thanks
Rod

Basically the only factor that affects solving speed is your CPU.
The solving speed is decided by the CPU speed, and its number of cores.
So a 3.2gHz CPU with 4 cores comes down to a 4x3.2=12.8gHz system.

Hey Scylla,

a neat feature that I'd imagine would be relatively easy to implement would be allowing to fix for more than one statistic. Right now you can only fix for one statistic (for example, top pair) but it would be useful in some cases to be able to fix for something like 'top pair' + 'flush draw'

Just a thought, as since the functionality to fix for a statistic is there it would seem easy to allow fixing for multiple ones!

Ty a lot for your time

CREV does preflop while GTO+ doesn't. I can't work out why that is not considered valuable. Eg working out a 3bet calling range.

Yes, CREV can indeed do preflop, and has several other additional features. GTO+ is more focussed on GTO and has additional features in that area. I would at the very least recommend starting with GTO+ because of its smoother learning curve.

Ok, I will consider it for future releases.

Love the play against the solution feature in gto+. Any chance you will release some drill style content so it's not all needed to be be produced individually on ones own?

I've set option "don't donk (unless you've shown aggression previously)", but if action is bet->call | check->bet->call | now on the River, OP player can donk (I guess since he had aggression or betting lead on the flop), but obv. most of the time we don't want that, right?

Scylla, complex trees are solving way faster than usual. Is this due to an update? im using the pc i always use and same spr btw.

Indeed...I was solving 30bb spots with 2 geometric bets 33 flops subsets and it solved very fast.This r not complex trees but still...

It would be difficult to provide general content here, given that users generally will be looking for custom spots.

If OOP bets the flop, then this is considered “previous aggression”.
You can however also specify no donking on the turn with the input 0d.
See the screenshot below.

I've done a quick check and didn't find any difference between v124 and v129.
Can you perhaps send a tree to support that you feel solves faster than usual?

Edit:
Come to think of it, to which version are you comparing?
Is it v128 or a much older version?
Improvements were indeed made as compared to some older versions.

U mean save file that we solved?What's the email?
It is 85MB?It is possible to sand it through email?

Ok, I've sent you a PM.

Hi scylla,

To see the turn and river distributions with the newest update, do we have to re-run the subset?

Also how do we get to the turn distributions?

Thanks.

yeah, I understand the logic behind it, but I'd say that most players if not all, consider “previous aggression” only if street before was closed and player had last aggression IMO, even in practice you can see that line is not used much and everyone would call it donking.

So this means that for every sim where OP has initiative we have to what wout for that and add that extra line, could you consider to remove that in next update please?

Ok, I will consider it for future releases.

Yes, this feature indeed only works for trees calculated with v129 (or later).

For this use the navigator.

don't know if this was asked before, but should the GTO+ and other solvers have same or very similar results and frequencies if solved to let's say 0,25%? If we input same ranges and sizings etc...

Hi,

if Im understanding it right, the drill option is only available in a way that it locks down the flop/turn/river cards and only changes my own holecards? Wouldnt it make sense to be able to drill certain spot in the gametree but with the communitycards also rotating within the solved subset? Sorry if this is already possible and thanks in advance!

interesting comparison here :

GTO+ and PioSOLVER Comparison/Validation [2020]

Hi Scylla,

Is it possible to display the relative percentages (an not the absolute) of diefferent actions inside of a handgroup.? For example if you have 5% sets and check 40% of them then I would like to see 40% instead of 2%. I don't need those absolute numbers. Maybe you could also implement a toggle for displaying both, but I don't think that these absolute percentages are very useful for most users. And displaying the distribution for different handgroups in a simpler way (just 3 bars side by side for example for a checking and 2 betting ranges, like simple postflop) would be more useful too, because you get a broad picture of the whole range-distribution much faster and if you want to see the details you have to take a closer look on specific handcombinations anyway. Thank you!

The turn/river is randomly drawn upon each new hand. This is unless you use F2 to replay a hand, in which case the same turn/river will be used. However, when using either F1, or by completing a hand and moving to the next one, the turn/river will always be randomly drawn.