Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
 

Go Back   Two Plus Two Poker Forums > >

Notices

Commercial Software Discussion of commercial gambling-related / poker software & commercial graphics modifications

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-30-2017, 11:37 AM   #6426
scylla
Pooh-Bah
 
scylla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,366
Re: CardRunnersEV

Quote:
Originally Posted by St3nsy View Post
Still on schedule for release today?
Yes, I'm editing the video at the moment.
These ~10 minute videos actually take quite a bit of time to produce.
scylla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2017, 12:40 PM   #6427
St3nsy
stranger
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 12
Re: CardRunnersEV

Quote:
Originally Posted by scylla View Post
Yes, I'm editing the video at the moment.
These ~10 minute videos actually take quite a bit of time to produce.
Ty
St3nsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2017, 12:49 PM   #6428
adrissan
stranger
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 11
Re: CardRunnersEV

Quote:
Originally Posted by scylla View Post
Yes, I'm editing the video at the moment.
These ~10 minute videos actually take quite a bit of time to produce.
Awesome! Your videos are always clear and very instructive! CardRunnersEV

Enviado de meu SM-G610M usando Tapatalk
adrissan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2017, 01:43 PM   #6429
disident
journeyman
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 276
Re: CardRunnersEV

To create a preflop range(an optimal response to an open)in CREV we need only a starting point, right?Like UTG opens 2.5bb with given range and if BTN is defending we need to lock further action at that check point and solve it?
disident is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2017, 01:53 PM   #6430
scylla
Pooh-Bah
 
scylla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,366
Re: CardRunnersEV

Quote:
Originally Posted by disident View Post
To create a preflop range(an optimal response to an open)in CREV we need only a starting point, right?Like UTG opens 2.5bb with given range and if BTN is defending we need to lock further action at that check point and solve it?
CREV is a decision tree based calculator. If you enter a decision tree, then it will calculate the EV, equity, etc of every item within that tree. These calculations will require a completed tree. Should you have further questions, then can you please send a savefile to support? This will help making clear exactly which spot you're referring to.

Last edited by scylla; 12-30-2017 at 02:03 PM.
scylla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2017, 02:05 PM   #6431
disident
journeyman
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 276
Re: CardRunnersEV

I see.That means UTG vs BTN tree all the way to river (showdown) not only preflop.Thanks for the awsome support job u r doing with your products.
disident is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2017, 03:28 PM   #6432
jasonhau
newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 46
Re: CardRunnersEV

I have download the v105, looks awesome, thanks for scylla with last 2 month hard work!
jasonhau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2017, 07:27 PM   #6433
HAMsmoke
stranger
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 12
Re: CardRunnersEV

It appears the website for GTO+ is not reachable, and I have been trying for about 3 hours now. Hopefully it clears up soon. I'm pretty sure it is not me, but I have been wrong before.
HAMsmoke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2017, 07:31 PM   #6434
Blunderer
grinder
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 500
Re: CardRunnersEV

Its working for me http://www.cardrunnersev.com/gtoplus.html

Nice update Scylla - very nicely designed.
Blunderer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2017, 07:43 PM   #6435
scylla
Pooh-Bah
 
scylla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,366
Re: CardRunnersEV

Quote:
Originally Posted by HAMsmoke View Post
It appears the website for GTO+ is not reachable, and I have been trying for about 3 hours now. Hopefully it clears up soon. I'm pretty sure it is not me, but I have been wrong before.
Please try a proxy or a different browser. The website appears to be up from all possible locations (https://www.uptrends.com/tools/uptime) and from almost all possible browsers (http://browsershots.org/).
scylla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2017, 01:11 AM   #6436
Fat_Vicious
enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 83
Re: CardRunnersEV

Hey, I am a total noob when it comes to technical stuff, so pls explain it to me like I am 5 yo

Why is GTO+ so cheap and why are Pio and others WAY more expensive? What can they do what GTO+ can't? Or in other words: what justifies prices 10-20 times as much as GTO+?

Excuse me, but after 10 years in the online poker world, I am always super sceptical when something sounds too good to be true.
Fat_Vicious is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2017, 04:01 AM   #6437
StraightFlooosh
adept
 
StraightFlooosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: DANGER ZONE
Posts: 705
Re: CardRunnersEV

Love the new release. Hopefully saveable preflop ranges are in the next release, otherwise idk how you guys plan to improve from here. Thanks scylla & GTO+ team!
StraightFlooosh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2017, 04:58 AM   #6438
Lenarych
enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 80
Re: CardRunnersEV

Please make FLH bets with the next update. When are you going launch it actually?
Lenarych is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2017, 06:21 AM   #6439
dth22
stranger
 
dth22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: SEA / Europe
Posts: 14
Re: CardRunnersEV

Quote:
Originally Posted by StraightFlooosh View Post
Love the new release. Hopefully saveable preflop ranges are in the next release, otherwise idk how you guys plan to improve from here. Thanks scylla & GTO+ team!
Thumbs up for preflop ranges.
dth22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2017, 06:59 AM   #6440
XXI
stranger
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 11
Re: CardRunnersEV

Will be perfectly, if we could import all preflop ranges from flopzilla.
XXI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2017, 12:01 PM   #6441
Fasteddie70
newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 20
Re: CardRunnersEV

Hi Scylla ,

tested the new version .

I created a Scenario where OOP has a bluff catch RAnge of 77-TT and IP a polar Range of QQ+,33-66 on a flop 222.

When I set default bets size for both to 60% OOP xc sometimes and xf sometimes .

If I change only the River Betsize for IP to 150% then OOP folds all hands vs a Range bet of IP on the flop.

How can OOP fold hands(77-TT) that are ahead of IP bluffs(33-66) ?

Any explanation would be appreciated
Fasteddie70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2017, 12:31 PM   #6442
scylla
Pooh-Bah
 
scylla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,366
Re: CardRunnersEV

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fasteddie70 View Post
Hi Scylla ,

tested the new version .

I created a Scenario where OOP has a bluff catch RAnge of 77-TT and IP a polar Range of QQ+,33-66 on a flop 222.

When I set default bets size for both to 60% OOP xc sometimes and xf sometimes .

If I change only the River Betsize for IP to 150% then OOP folds all hands vs a Range bet of IP on the flop.

How can OOP fold hands(77-TT) that are ahead of IP bluffs(33-66) ?

Any explanation would be appreciated
Can you send a savefile to support please?
Without knowing the exact spot it's always hard to answer these questions.
scylla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2017, 12:33 PM   #6443
scylla
Pooh-Bah
 
scylla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,366
Re: CardRunnersEV

Hi everyone,

Due to me having other obligations today, I will answer all posts tomorrow.

Best wishes for the new year!

Scylla
scylla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2018, 07:33 AM   #6444
disident
journeyman
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 276
Re: CardRunnersEV

When displaying results why entire decision combos doesn't match with bet/call/fold decision combos combined?
disident is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2018, 07:37 AM   #6445
scylla
Pooh-Bah
 
scylla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,366
Re: CardRunnersEV

Quote:
Originally Posted by disident View Post
When displaying results why entire decision combos doesn't match with bet/call/fold decision combos combined?
If I understand you correctly, then it should match. The only thing that I can think of is that there may be a tiny difference due to rounding in some of the values.
scylla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2018, 08:05 AM   #6446
disident
journeyman
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 276
Re: CardRunnersEV

Quote:
Originally Posted by scylla View Post
If I understand you correctly, then it should match. The only thing that I can think of is that there may be a tiny difference due to rounding in some of the values.
After running solver(with 0.75 bet as only option) the results for player 1 range displayed in combos are:Entire decision Combos 224.1 (10.35/213.8) bet75% 104.7 (10.35/94.34)check 224.1 (10.35/213.8)
So solver is suggesting bet 4.58% check 95.4% but entire decision and checking decision are displayed as 224.1 combos.
I choose no rake because I was trying to figure out math model that solver is using but numbers r confusing. Even more in advanced section if i choose 2 possible bet sizes.
disident is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2018, 08:19 AM   #6447
scylla
Pooh-Bah
 
scylla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,366
Re: CardRunnersEV

Quote:
Originally Posted by disident View Post
After running solver(with 0.75 bet as only option) the results for player 1 range displayed in combos are:Entire decision Combos 224.1 (10.35/213.8) bet75% 104.7 (10.35/94.34)check 224.1 (10.35/213.8)
So solver is suggesting bet 4.58% check 95.4% but entire decision and checking decision are displayed as 224.1 combos.
I choose no rake because I was trying to figure out math model that solver is using but numbers r confusing. Even more in advanced section if i choose 2 possible bet sizes.
Well, 10.35 + 213.8 = 224.15. It's just that it's displayed as 224.1 due to rounding. We can tweak this a bit so that all values have the exact same accuracy, but it does seem to be ok.
scylla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2018, 08:19 AM   #6448
disident
journeyman
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 276
Re: CardRunnersEV

Oh I see,It is merging.It is betting 10.35 combos out of 104.7 combos out of entire 224.1 combos.Checkin range is merging with entire range.
disident is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2018, 06:31 PM   #6449
pucmo
adept
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Euro
Posts: 701
Re: CardRunnersEV

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat_Vicious View Post
Hey, I am a total noob when it comes to technical stuff, so pls explain it to me like I am 5 yo

Why is GTO+ so cheap and why are Pio and others WAY more expensive? What can they do what GTO+ can't? Or in other words: what justifies prices 10-20 times as much as GTO+?

Excuse me, but after 10 years in the online poker world, I am always super sceptical when something sounds too good to be true.
Not being able to define ranges postflop, perhaps? I didn't buy it because of that lack (and now I play mainly omahas).
pucmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2018, 07:06 AM   #6450
scylla
Pooh-Bah
 
scylla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,366
Re: CardRunnersEV

Quote:
Originally Posted by pucmo View Post
Not being able to define ranges postflop, perhaps? I didn't buy it because of that lack (and now I play mainly omahas).
Yes, you can define postflop strategies.
It's explained in the first video here: http://www.cardrunnersev.com/gtoplus.html
Just click on "Lock+Edit decision" and enter any strategies that you like.
It's even possible to set weighted strategies.
scylla is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply
      

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2008-2017, Two Plus Two Interactive
 
 
Poker Players - Streaming Live Online