[GTO] GTO+/CardRunnersEV?
04-11-2024
, 10:07 AM
Would it be possible to add something similar to a mass node lock function? Like being able to assign frequencies to each turn/river the same way we do with the combos in here.
Mostly to see if the flop strategy changes significantly if we know there is an over/under fold in other streets.
I did an experiment and only after node locking for an overfold on every river, did the betting frequency on the turn go from 54.6% to 100%, and if I leave a balanced defense just in one river, the betting frequency goes back to 54.6%.
Mostly to see if the flop strategy changes significantly if we know there is an over/under fold in other streets.
I did an experiment and only after node locking for an overfold on every river, did the betting frequency on the turn go from 54.6% to 100%, and if I leave a balanced defense just in one river, the betting frequency goes back to 54.6%.
Last edited by Demiurgus; 04-11-2024 at 10:20 AM.
04-12-2024
, 02:00 AM
Quote:
Would it be possible to add something similar to a mass node lock function? Like being able to assign frequencies to each turn/river the same way we do with the combos in here.
Mostly to see if the flop strategy changes significantly if we know there is an over/under fold in other streets.
I did an experiment and only after node locking for an overfold on every river, did the betting frequency on the turn go from 54.6% to 100%, and if I leave a balanced defense just in one river, the betting frequency goes back to 54.6%.
Mostly to see if the flop strategy changes significantly if we know there is an over/under fold in other streets.
I did an experiment and only after node locking for an overfold on every river, did the betting frequency on the turn go from 54.6% to 100%, and if I leave a balanced defense just in one river, the betting frequency goes back to 54.6%.
04-12-2024
, 06:22 PM
Scy!
Could filters turn cards be added to the new agg report?
For example:
- complete flush
-board paired
- Overcard on the flop
- Ax
- Straight Complete
- 2ble flush
And also if some filter (internal) could be used to ensure that if the action has a frequency of less than 1% or something like that, it should not show it?
It can happen that the Agg Reports take data from % of actions that are never carried out and in the next street it shows it to you as something absolute.
Last edited by Mates.; 04-12-2024 at 06:31 PM.
04-13-2024
, 02:12 AM
Quote:
Scy!
Could filters turn cards be added to the new agg report?
For example:
- complete flush
-board paired
- Overcard on the flop
- Ax
- Straight Complete
- 2ble flush
And also if some filter (internal) could be used to ensure that if the action has a frequency of less than 1% or something like that, it should not show it?
It can happen that the Agg Reports take data from % of actions that are never carried out and in the next street it shows it to you as something absolute.
Scy!
Could filters turn cards be added to the new agg report?
For example:
- complete flush
-board paired
- Overcard on the flop
- Ax
- Straight Complete
- 2ble flush
And also if some filter (internal) could be used to ensure that if the action has a frequency of less than 1% or something like that, it should not show it?
It can happen that the Agg Reports take data from % of actions that are never carried out and in the next street it shows it to you as something absolute.
Quote:
And also if some filter (internal) could be used to ensure that if the action has a frequency of less than 1% or something like that, it should not show it?
It can happen that the Agg Reports take data from % of actions that are never carried out and in the next street it shows it to you as something absolute.
It can happen that the Agg Reports take data from % of actions that are never carried out and in the next street it shows it to you as something absolute.
An alternative might be to display lines with a different intensity, depending on how often they are reached relatively to each other.
04-13-2024
, 04:46 PM
hey scylla how are you?
when i click through the navigator, once i click the "T", respectively the small "R" icon, the color of the players change, as in Player 1 aka the OOP player becomes green and Player 2 aka the IP player becomes blue. This is kinda confusing and I don't know if it is just me or if this is a bug.
when i click through the navigator, once i click the "T", respectively the small "R" icon, the color of the players change, as in Player 1 aka the OOP player becomes green and Player 2 aka the IP player becomes blue. This is kinda confusing and I don't know if it is just me or if this is a bug.
04-14-2024
, 01:58 AM
04-14-2024
, 02:02 AM
Quote:
hey scylla how are you?
when i click through the navigator, once i click the "T", respectively the small "R" icon, the color of the players change, as in Player 1 aka the OOP player becomes green and Player 2 aka the IP player becomes blue. This is kinda confusing and I don't know if it is just me or if this is a bug.
when i click through the navigator, once i click the "T", respectively the small "R" icon, the color of the players change, as in Player 1 aka the OOP player becomes green and Player 2 aka the IP player becomes blue. This is kinda confusing and I don't know if it is just me or if this is a bug.
Basically, the colours of the players alternate, between blue and green.
But it should reset to blue whenever a T or R is displayed.
It appears that we overlooked that visual part of the code.
We'll take care of it for the next update.