Quote:
Originally Posted by Dockerexe
Sending 4 hours after start and expecting your res to be held is not fair, you are the only person on this forum who thinks this is ok.
Then to demand your 9% back from another person who stepped in when you were MIA and have the audacity to tell him to shut up after he was kind enough to let you have the 9%, which you sent after knowing you no longer had that 9%, is appalling.
I think same, if you send after start you should not be reserved, but that was ok on monday. I did not mention in thread like on mondays package that I will send later, but I sent claynuts a Private message.
I did not demand to get it back, I asked to get it back. He never gave me the 9% (have I missed somthing). He answerd 1.5 hours later and said package is profit so he wont give up the 9%. Thats fair enough for his sake. He told me to shut up first and I just reply.
You have to see the hole story here, not only this package. (ref my PM). Its not about the $$$ issue here, its whats right and wrong.
Sunday package I said I had maxed my limit and managed to send him late in his session when he had zero score.
Monday I said I send later in the mondays package thread, I sent him what i owed after the session (or the day after)
I did not post anything in this thread today but I rememberd I had sent him a msg on private messages and I did not get any respons from him and I tought I was In. When I sent him the money I did not know he was profit or anything. Therefor i feel its unfair.