Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
**** 2012 World Championship LC Thread **** **** 2012 World Championship LC Thread ****

04-25-2012 , 02:10 PM
^
lol
04-26-2012 , 05:20 AM
too bad, Ding was the only chinese i had been rooting for to advance. All the others seem so generic.
04-26-2012 , 05:55 AM
all cheats too
04-26-2012 , 06:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noir_Desir
too bad, Ding was the only chinese i had been rooting for to advance. All the others seem so generic.
They're like that in pool as well. All the phillipinos seem to have flair and different cue actions, whereas all the Chinese Taipei players are mechanical and play like robots.
04-26-2012 , 09:41 AM
This is the most open championship I've ever seen. Really shows the awesome strength and depth in the game right now. I haven't seen anyone play where I thought yeah they've got no shot at winning this. Hugely impresses by David Gilbert.
04-26-2012 , 11:12 AM
Gilbert playin well but Robertson turned on the beast mode, looking very strong. Pretty happy I haven´t bet on matches yet haha crazy results.
05-12-2012 , 04:24 PM
Ronnie won. Good to see. However, he won't reach 7. He should get to 5 though. Hendry retired, about time too. It must be hard to go from being The Man to being an Also Ran.
05-12-2012 , 04:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Al Mirpuri
Ronnie won. Good to see. However, he won't reach 7. He should get to 5 though. Hendry retired, about time too. It must be hard to go from being The Man to being an Also Ran.
Lol, is this the same also ran who had a 147 and knocked out (read humiliated) the defending champion?

I'm guessing Hendry has a sweet deal in the far east which is worth more than he can win playing.
05-12-2012 , 08:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Banzai
Lol, is this the same also ran who had a 147 and knocked out (read humiliated) the defending champion?
We are talking about Stephen Hendry's standards. He agrees with me (or I with him w/e) that is why he retired.

His career as it stands is of a mediocre pro not that of the high flyer he once was. Don't get carried away by the 147, Stephen didn't. He played it down in his retirement speech.


Lol at Banzai not understanding a winner's pyschology.
05-13-2012 , 08:11 AM
Hendry (and Davis for that matter) were the best because of how close their B game (and C, D and E game for that matter) were to their A game.

Hendry is still World Class when his A game is in shape, but his B game now resembles a medicore tour journeyman, and to a player whose consistency and ability to always bring their best to the table was a true hallmark the level of frustration must be mind boggling.

IMO this is also testimony to the fact that Davis has a surprisingly strong case to be considered the true all time best, as his ability to keep going for so long and not snap like Hendry is perhaps even more astonishing than 7 world titles.
05-13-2012 , 04:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wamy Einehouse
Hendry (and Davis for that matter) were the best because of how close their B game (and C, D and E game for that matter) were to their A game.

Hendry is still World Class when his A game is in shape, but his B game now resembles a medicore tour journeyman, and to a player whose consistency and ability to always bring their best to the table was a true hallmark the level of frustration must be mind boggling.

IMO this is also testimony to the fact that Davis has a surprisingly strong case to be considered the true all time best, as his ability to keep going for so long and not snap like Hendry is perhaps even more astonishing than 7 world titles.
Davis was a great winner but also a great loser. It's rare for a player, in any game or sport, to dominate their era yet be a class act when they lose because a certain kind of arrogance usually comes with the territory. And he really did dominate, as did Hendry. Hendry learned eventually, as we all do, to be a good loser.

For the record, I rate Hendry as the BOAT for his dominance and also the way he changed the way the game is played, but will side with Davis as the GOAT cos you never met a nicer bloke who was the best in his time, competed with the best after his time, beat the best in other cue sports, and would still love the game as much anyway even if his 10,000 hours hadn't paid off. And he still holds the record for tourneys won, whatever that's worth.

Oh and he said "good shot" to me when I was a 17 year old who had played a bit of pool in the pub and was trying my hand at snooker playing on the table next to his. That 17 year old will never forget that.

      
m