Quote:
Originally Posted by K.O.S.
When Rust said, "We didn't get them all," I had the briefest fantasy of the show('s press releases) trolling us, meaning MM/WH were actually returning to continue the story for season 2.
Instead, we did get trolled...it was just by the show including the Audrey/painting stuff for no real reason at all. After a great start, I felt like this was just too formulaic and cheesy of a finale. The NCFOM comparison is a great one, as both endings sucked but will consistently get praised by people who want to seem smart.
It's funny because the ending totally could have set up a season 2, but also can stand alone. It was kind of like the ending of a show that didn't know if it was getting another season. I'm cool with it though, because there's a meaning behind it and a moral to the story and how it ended.
Despite being an ardent believer we should have had an Audrey resolution, I don't believe the painting stuff was without reason. For example, the black stars in the painting could just be a motif. It shows that the case is impacting Marty's home life even though he wants to keep them separate, and that the cult is having a pervasive influence on the community. "Some people like a sense of community," was Marty's line in the revival tent (or close to it).
That's also not something she had to be influenced by the cult directly to have picked up on. She could have seen someone with black star tattoos, or seen them tagged on a building in graffiti, or whatever. So to me that works, really well actually, as a motif.
That's why I go back to the 5-on-1 doll scene, and to a lesser extent the painting that matched the mental hospital one - but that can be explained away more easily in a variety of ways, and we are never explicitly told that Audrey painted it. Maybe they wanted us to think of Marty's bedroom as akin to a mental hospital, maybe it's just a random piece of art that was mass-sold, maybe Audrey painted it and won a contest and they re-created it in the hospital, maybe she was there getting treatment and saw it and re-painted it (we know she was on meds at one point).
I have yet to see an explanation of the doll scene being 5 on 1 that makes sense to me. Everything else with her character would have served a lot of purpose and worked well, and that scene could have been done differently and fit into the purpose of the rest of Audrey's character development.
To be honest, that's the type of thing that blows my mind that it doesn't end up on the proverbial cutting room floor. Someone as brilliant as Pizzolatto clearly is as a writer doesn't watch the whole thing back before it airs and go, wait a second, we need to nix that 3-second shot, it doesn't work?