Quote:
Originally Posted by CLtop
So I just got around to watching season 2 for the first time (last one I hadn’t seen), how was there any controversy over Tina winning? I mean Colby was physically dominant but from merge on Tina was running the show I’m pretty sure. Taking out Amber and especially Jerri was huge for Tina’s position and end-game and just took options away from Colby. Tina played pretty close to the best game possible for her. She’s not going to win many final immunity challenges so she needs to get to a final 3 where she’s likely to be taken to the finals. Both Colby and Keith seemed ready to take her. She probably made a small mistake pre-merge not trying to get rid of Amber or Mitchell on the second vote but that’s the only mistake I see. If Colby takes any of Jerri, Amber or Keith to the final 2 with him he wins. I’m rambling but Colby made several mistakes including 1 huge one and Tina played nearly flawlessly so very deserving winner in my opinion.
The controversy wasn't in her winning, but that Colby made a really bad play taking her instead of Keith, which would have made him a near lock for the million. It's often referred to as the $900,000 mistake, and the first major one in the history of the show.
And he had been painted all season as a likable hero and challenge monster, essentially edited that he was going to win. And it seemed like even more lemon juice in the cut when Tina was asked afterward what she attributed her win to and she said, "Luck." FWIW I like Tina a lot and think she played just fine and don't begrudge her the win at all. And Colby seemed genuinely stoked when she won, so it's all good.
Yeah, f the haters, I think Australia was a pretty good season. I haven't seen any season since its first airing, so maybe it doesn't hold up compared to recent seasons, but for its time, was a great follow up to season 1.